11 Internet portals threatened with blocking due to NTV-Profit statement

    Today, the Moscow City Court website immediately appeared 11 decisions dated September 4.
    All of them were accepted on the basis of statements from NTV-Profit LLC and relate to the following film production:
    “Bourgeois’s Birthday” (15 episodes), “Mom”, “Thief”, “Two Moons, Three Suns”, “Russian Revolt”, “Fan”, “Keys to Death”, “Sharp turns” (12 episodes), “It is easy to die.”

    image

    The court rulings contain references to 11 Internet portals:
    free-torrents.org
    inetkino.org
    rejtinga.net
    nnm-club.me
    hotbase.org
    x-torrents.org
    goldenshara.com
    rutor.org
    torrnado.ru
    torrent-shara.org
    nntt. org

    I note that the Moscow City Court, finally, began to indicate in its definitions the names of Internet resources, which imposes interim measures to block. I hope the censored "* * *", as in previous decisions, are a thing of the past.

    This is the most massive blow in one day to Internet resources for the entire practice of using both 139-FZ (the law on black lists of sites) and the “anti-piracy” 187-FZ.
    We clearly see how the blocking machine, covered by the selfish interests of various lobbyists, is gaining momentum. And such statements already seem ridiculous and ridiculous (or don't they seem?): The

    image

    Internet is still alive now, but then, already in the month of law enforcement 187-FZ a lot of questions have accumulated both to the Moscow City Court and to Roskomnadzor and to the situation as a whole.
    To the first one in the transparency of decisions and the procedure for presenting information. And to the second in a frivolous interpretation of court decisions, ignoring the terms of interim measures to block and indicating over-redundant requirements for Internet resources to delete this or that information.
    Well, the so-called copyright holders “felt the blood” and dig into Runet with a tougher grip.

    And all this bacchanalia begins to unfold fully against the background of Putin ’s statement that even he already doubts the adequacy of the norms laid down in 187-FZ and called for “not to kill the Internet with anti-piracy law”.
    By the way, why is he ready to delve into the essence of the law after signing it? Don't you think there is something strange about this? He did not read the law that he signed? Hm.

    PS Meanwhile, Roskomnadzor sent instructions to operators to block the NNM-Club portal , which I described earlier about the threat of blocking .
    The nnm-club.me domain has been added to the Register for 187-FZ (although nnm-club.RU is listed in the court decision), the IP address is 46.21.145.148 and there are dozens of page pointers.

    Based on materials:
    RosKomSvoboda ,
    Roskomnadzor ,
    Moscow City Court

    Only registered users can participate in the survey. Please come in.

    What will happen to the “anti-piracy” law after Putin’s statement?

    • 12.9% The law will be sent for revision, they will soften more, there will be no tightening or there will be at least 312
    • 31.3% of the law will be sent for revision, toughened up more, although certain points will be softened
    • 2.8% The law will be redone in a new way 69
    • 4.3% the law will be repealed 106
    • 45.8% of the law will not be touched at all 1106
    • 2.6% Other 63

    Also popular now: