May 20, 2009 at 18:36Caution! New Runner Interface
What do you think, how much does it cost to click on an ad on the keyword “online advertising”: 0.1 or 29 rubles? ..
... If you, like me, thought that 0.1 rubles, then you were mistaken, as I did.
What is the “Current bid” and where it says that the value is taken from the “Your bets” field clearly in the Runner they didn’t explain to me, the erroneously debited order of 400 UAH ($ 50) was not returned, but they promised to inform the developers that it should not be make money by misleading users.
Be careful not to click the beak like an author! Well, to the developers of systems that relate to money debiting, there is a huge human request - to make the interfaces as clear as possible.
UPD 1: The case takes an unexpected turn, despite the denial of the support service (2 different managers in electronic correspondence and by phone), the representative of Mantissa Runner admits that this is a mistake , and the money should be debited in the first column. Keep track of the situation. I wonder how many more people were affected by this system failure?
UPD 2 : All the same Mantissa Runner spokesman reportsthat 0.1 bets were set after the funds were completed by their robot, which will no longer be repeated in order to avoid such ambiguities. Unfortunately, for the lack of screenshots of the campaign during work, the author cannot refute this hypothesis. Therefore, let's believe in the good, namely, that the author got money because of personal carelessness (did not notice his own high rates from past companies during the resumption), but the highly professional support service of “Runner” could not plainly explain to him why one amount was debited and is shown in the settings is different.
... If you, like me, thought that 0.1 rubles, then you were mistaken, as I did.
What is the “Current bid” and where it says that the value is taken from the “Your bets” field clearly in the Runner they didn’t explain to me, the erroneously debited order of 400 UAH ($ 50) was not returned, but they promised to inform the developers that it should not be make money by misleading users.
Be careful not to click the beak like an author! Well, to the developers of systems that relate to money debiting, there is a huge human request - to make the interfaces as clear as possible.
UPD 1: The case takes an unexpected turn, despite the denial of the support service (2 different managers in electronic correspondence and by phone), the representative of Mantissa Runner admits that this is a mistake , and the money should be debited in the first column. Keep track of the situation. I wonder how many more people were affected by this system failure?
UPD 2 : All the same Mantissa Runner spokesman reportsthat 0.1 bets were set after the funds were completed by their robot, which will no longer be repeated in order to avoid such ambiguities. Unfortunately, for the lack of screenshots of the campaign during work, the author cannot refute this hypothesis. Therefore, let's believe in the good, namely, that the author got money because of personal carelessness (did not notice his own high rates from past companies during the resumption), but the highly professional support service of “Runner” could not plainly explain to him why one amount was debited and is shown in the settings is different.