The choice of SMS billing for the root
In the process of choosing SMS billing for a rutraft, I came across this review: allpublication.ru/sms
Convenient structure, however, there is nothing at all to the column “billing commission or how much the partner receives”.
I decided to look at the rates and compare.
To begin with, I calculated the distribution of payments by operators.
For this, infa about 33154 payments of one Russian service was used. Sanchez, Respect :)
Here are the top5 operators:
Further for this five I collected the tariffs of all billing for a 5-dollar SMS-ku.
Where there was no such tariff, I drove the nearest one. In the process drop out:
It turned out like this:
Then, for each billing, I calculated the average income from SMS: amounts (operator_ tariff * operator_ percent) / number of operators.
Well, I counted as a percentage of the leader’s profitability:
Now it remains to look at the top:
As a result, the title of the correct SMS billing is awarded: smsdostup.ru .
UP: and my reflink to boot.
If someone doesn’t count, please poke :)
Convenient structure, however, there is nothing at all to the column “billing commission or how much the partner receives”.
I decided to look at the rates and compare.
To begin with, I calculated the distribution of payments by operators.
For this, infa about 33154 payments of one Russian service was used. Sanchez, Respect :)
Here are the top5 operators:
operator | percentage of payments |
---|---|
Mts | 33.78 |
Megafon | 21.21 |
Beeline | 11.59 |
Umc | 6.64 |
KievStar | 4.69 |
Further for this five I collected the tariffs of all billing for a 5-dollar SMS-ku.
Where there was no such tariff, I drove the nearest one. In the process drop out:
- smspartner.ru - site not available
- pokazun.ru/ - did not find tariffs
- goldfon.ru - incomprehensible tariffs in Ukraine, the rest are below average
- smsmedia.ru - muddy tariffs
- i-free.ru - did not find tariffs
It turned out like this:
billing | mts | megafon | beeline | umc | kievstar |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
smsmoney.tv | 82.86 | 65.32 | 87.15 | 38.92 | 42.1 |
geopay.ru | 70.45 | 60.57 | 87.62 | 28.34 | 42.64 |
a1agregator.ru | 99.9 | 70.6 | 94.6 | 42.3 | 52.9 |
cmcbilling.ru | 77.72 | 72.42 | 97.09 | 36.75 | 39.57 |
smsrent.ru | 81.66 | 63.87 | 84.23 | 55.85 | 65.56 |
smszamok.ru | 99.01 | 73.5 | 92.63 | 54 | 54 |
mobilcent.ru | 89 | 73.8 | 94.8 | 57 | 57 |
smsonline.ru | 59.5 | 59.5 | 59.5 | 59.5 | 59.5 |
smscoin.com | 82.1 | 66.3 | 87.59 | 60 | 60 |
smsdostup.ru | 101.43 | 72.19 | 96.17 | 43.85 | 54.43 |
Then, for each billing, I calculated the average income from SMS: amounts (operator_ tariff * operator_ percent) / number of operators.
billing | Wed SMS revenue ($ 5) |
---|---|
smsdostup.ru | 66.19 |
smszamok.ru | 65.89 |
a1agregator.ru | 64.97 |
mobilcent.ru | 63.16 |
smscoin.com | 58.75 |
smsrent.ru | 57.68 |
cmcbilling.ru | 57.16 |
smsmoney.tv | 56.5 |
geopay.ru | 50.68 |
smsonline.ru | 46.36 |
Well, I counted as a percentage of the leader’s profitability:
billing | profitability,% |
---|---|
smsdostup.ru | 100 |
smszamok.ru | 99.55 |
a1agregator.ru | 98.16 |
mobilcent.ru | 95.42 |
smscoin.com | 88.76 |
smsrent.ru | 87.14 |
cmcbilling.ru | 86.36 |
smsmoney.tv | 85.36 |
geopay.ru | 76.57 |
smsonline.ru | 70.04 |
Now it remains to look at the top:
- smsdostup.ru - acquaintances use, reviews are good. With good traffic, they increase the percentage and give better prefixes.
- smszamok.ru - none of my friends used it. There is no license to provide telematic services, but the age is respectable. The person paying the overhead costs and expenses is the user. For individuals, passport data must be specified in the account settings.
- a1agregator.ru - according to acquaintances a year ago, terribly sheyvili + this muddy story with Belarus.
- mobilcent.ru - a person paying overhead costs and expenses - the user. Young.
As a result, the title of the correct SMS billing is awarded: smsdostup.ru .
UP: and my reflink to boot.
If someone doesn’t count, please poke :)