What is missing bittorrent?
I propose to discuss the functional disadvantages of torrent networks, as well as suggest possible solutions and workarounds.
1. The difficulty of adding / removing a file from an existing distribution.
2. Distributions can intersect in separate files , as well as duplicate on different trackers, in such cases, the organization of traffic and the degree of access to the siders is clearly far from optimal.
3. The complexity of arranging distribution for many trackers , as a result, it seems to me that it is necessary to introduce an extended format for metadata in a torrent file, some kind of ID3 analogue.
4. Incomplete distribution(availability <1), maybe the problem can be partially solved by crossing torrent with file hosting, which also appears as a helper in super-sitting.
5. The complexity of automating data transfer between a small group of people
For me, ideally - this is a kind of distributed synchronized folder, plus plugins for instant messengers - I threw the file into the window and went distributing / downloading.
6. Lack of a centralized search on trackers.
The best of them seems to me to be the option [search] + ". Torrent" driven into google, but as a rule, the search engine produces a huge number of black SEO-crafts.
7. Ease of bypassing traffic accounting , as a result, many trackers are filled with leech-only users.
eight.Technical problems of connection for many users A
difficult problem to solve, but the fact remains that for many users the network settings of software, OS and equipment greatly underestimate the speed of torrent networks, UPnP technology, designed to partially solve these problems, is usually ineffective.
PS I use torrents.ru, game-torrent.info, demonoid and a number of other trackers, plus I use it for direct file sharing with friends and colleagues.
1. The difficulty of adding / removing a file from an existing distribution.
2. Distributions can intersect in separate files , as well as duplicate on different trackers, in such cases, the organization of traffic and the degree of access to the siders is clearly far from optimal.
3. The complexity of arranging distribution for many trackers , as a result, it seems to me that it is necessary to introduce an extended format for metadata in a torrent file, some kind of ID3 analogue.
4. Incomplete distribution(availability <1), maybe the problem can be partially solved by crossing torrent with file hosting, which also appears as a helper in super-sitting.
5. The complexity of automating data transfer between a small group of people
For me, ideally - this is a kind of distributed synchronized folder, plus plugins for instant messengers - I threw the file into the window and went distributing / downloading.
6. Lack of a centralized search on trackers.
The best of them seems to me to be the option [search] + ". Torrent" driven into google, but as a rule, the search engine produces a huge number of black SEO-crafts.
7. Ease of bypassing traffic accounting , as a result, many trackers are filled with leech-only users.
eight.Technical problems of connection for many users A
difficult problem to solve, but the fact remains that for many users the network settings of software, OS and equipment greatly underestimate the speed of torrent networks, UPnP technology, designed to partially solve these problems, is usually ineffective.
PS I use torrents.ru, game-torrent.info, demonoid and a number of other trackers, plus I use it for direct file sharing with friends and colleagues.