Vicious element of VKontakte

    A few months ago, the Vkontakte website was opened for public dialogue with users, largely thanks to Vladislav Tsyplukhin ( invladis ) and the site Habr - an interesting and authoritative platform in its own way. They are listening to opinions. That's why Vkontakte is trying to be open. It seems more accurate. In fact, everything is different

    But now is not about that.Now - about people who spoil this image. Hide their decisions, hide actions, poison those who are objectionable with an eternal ban - this is such fun, you know. The main thing is to write a fabricated reason.
    Distribution of the so-called disclaimers (plates of incorrect information on the user’s page) wholesale and retail, assigning the votes written off “for no reason” to your beloved. Moreover, it was not moderators who were engaged in this (as a rule, who had recently bought a post for Judas' 30 pieces of silver and, therefore, cowardly by definition), but administrators who did not achieve anything outstanding in the internal hierarchy of the site.
    In confirmation of this, Viktor Strelchuk wrote a very entertaining post on his blog ( The most informative in another - I checked the facts cited by him through a friend of the administrator and - oh, a miracle! - everything was confirmed. Screenshots, for obvious reasons, will not be posted in public - no one wants to stay out of work.

    Yesterday I read the article “There is no limit to lawlessness” ( ) and a lot of interesting things came up in my memory. For example…
    In the summer of 2009 we (at that time - like-minded people) accidentally discovered a bug in the API 2.0 system - it just “popped up” by itself. The guys wanted to be mischievous: spend a part on gifts and a rating (well, that's how 25% of the found treasure is due - they decided). And I - it just so happened - and there were voices and ratings and gifts. Not a greed for them was. I decided to tell Alexei Bogatov about the bug - and he is "in the tank" - the PM is closed. A companion moderator said. that he transmitted a bug report to Alexei through his channels. I went to bed.
    Morning: votes are not written off, everyone doesn’t care about the bug, the reaction from Alexei is zero. “It’s your business,” I thought, and transferred the voices to the id of those who helped to enter the administration. It seems - everything - a curtain. Time passed, I became the official developer of VK applications, got the rights of a moderator. After a couple of days, Alexei Bogatov took away his rights and said something strange: "You are a thief, thieves do not belong here." In fact - a jurisdictional statement, and immoral to the same. The reaction to my constructive answer is to blacklist me wherever possible.

    Imagine, still trying to defend my honest name - and nothing. "The most open company in the world" has traditionally "taken the pose" of a resentful administrator, offended by the average user aobogatov Alexey Bogatov

    Comical and funny, the biggest social network in Russia, offended by only one user.

    In pursuit: this is not a stupid nagging, just a call to act, get rid of the closed segments of the site and even from the whole system of “mutual responsibility” and protect your own, which has been established for 3 years.

    Also popular now: