Debunking Common Myths About the $mol Framework
$mol isn't limited to just updating the DOM like many popular frameworks. It's a set of orthogonal libraries with a unified architecture, competing with corporate in-house solutions built on top of React or similar tools. Developers who claim to work 'on React' are often creating their own frameworks in practice, where the library itself solves only a small fraction of the problems.
A typical issue is the lack of framework design experience among application developers. $mol offers a ready-made architecture that minimizes such risks.
The Creator's Experience and Paradigms
Over 20 years of commercial development at companies like Yandex, Wrike, and Deutsche Bank. The author introduced the concepts of Object-Reactive Programming and Fractal Testing. Dozens of talks and hundreds of articles on computer science.
Comparing this to a typical 'React architect' with 5 years of experience highlights the difference in depth of approach. $mol is built on proven principles, not local hype.
Key Experience Differences:
- Broad overview of frameworks vs. narrow specialization.
- Designing tools vs. using others' tools.
- Focus on invariants and performance.
Communication Style and Motivation
The author responds with respect to respect, and sarcasm to misinformation. The absence of corporate constraints allows for straightforwardness. Criticism often masks an unwillingness to change habits.
Motivation of in-house developers: extending deadlines for career growth, promoting familiar tech stacks. In $mol, the priority is saving time.
- Pushing inefficient technologies.
- Inflating team size under the guise of scaling.
- Ignoring alternatives to maintain the status quo.
Benchmarks and Performance
$mol leads in tests, including comparisons with Vanilla JS. The reason: intelligent optimization, not raw speed. Automatic rendering virtualization eliminates dependency on data volume.
Manually implementing this without abstractions is practically impossible. Third-party benchmarks often ignore $mol due to a lack of marketing.
Stability and Longevity
10+ years of development without corporate sponsorship. The architecture is ecosystemic: developing with $mol is identical to maintaining the framework itself.
Comparison with competitors:
| Framework | Developer | Years | Age |
|-----------|-------------|------|---------|
| AngularJS | Google | 2012–2018 | 6 years |
| BEM.js | Yandex | 2013–2017 | 4 years |
| $mol | Hyper Dev | 2016–... | 9+ years |
Hiring Specialists
$mol can be mastered by any experienced TypeScript developer. The architecture is simple: MAM conventions + a reactive system for invariants + a declarative component language.
Searching resumes is less important than the ability to delve into the domain and legacy code. In-house frameworks are more complex due to their uniqueness.
- Minimal boilerplate.
- Runtime access to states.
- Semantic entity names.
Commercial Application
Small companies use $mol to accelerate development without compromising on quality. The architecture enforces best practices: it's easier to do things well than poorly.
Clients note predictability and speed. More time for edge cases, less for routine tasks.
Library Maturity
$mol consists of orthogonal modules: stable cores + experimental PoCs. There are rough edges, but the advantages outweigh them.
Comparison: small teams using $mol outperform large teams on popular stacks across all metrics.
Support and Community
Quick bug fixes are the norm thanks to maintainer motivation. A contrast to corporate queues and auto-closures.
Expecting premium support for free is unrealistic. A respectful approach speeds up assistance.
Documentation and Code Exploration
Documentation is a series of articles on web development as a whole. The code is convenient for analysis:
- Small modules focused on a single task.
- No copy-paste.
- Global semantic names.
Useful even outside of $mol.
Integrations and Openness
MAM ecosystem: $node namespaces for NodeJS, $lib for NPM. Easy to package MAM into NPM packages.
The framework is self-sufficient but not closed off.
Key Takeaways
- $mol competes with in-house frameworks, not with React.
- Automatic virtualization delivers performance exceeding Vanilla JS.
- The architecture allows any TS developer to contribute.
- 10+ years of stability without corporate backing.
- MAM ensures integration with NPM/NodeJS.
— Editorial Team
No comments yet.