Comparison of css3 & html5 Browsers

    For a long time I have not seen articles about comparing browsers, in connection with a flying disk, I thought, maybe I can switch from ff to something else (everyone is used to looking for the best).

    It became interesting who is now leading the market. The easiest way to take and compare what else to do.


    I looked through a number of articles on the hml5 account:
    Testing HTML5 technologies.
    How to test a web browser for compatibility with HTML5?
    Test and compare five web browsers in Windows 7 and OS X Mountain Lion
    Test and compare web browsers: Chrome 20, Opera 12, Firefox 13
    Test and compare web browsers | The top five

    . Comparisons may not always be adequate in communication and using various services and tests. The following services were used for the test:

    Css:

    Maze Solver
    css3test.com
    CSS3 Selectors Test
    Acid3

    Html5

    html5test
    Test2
    peacekeeper

    So we drove.

    FF 18.0.2



    Maze Solver - CSS3 Layout Performance Test



    Css3test.com



    CSS3 Selectors Test

    From the 41 selectors 41 have passed, 0 are buggy and 0 are unsupported (Passed 574 out of 574 tests)

    Acid3



    html5test



    Test2



    Peacekeeper




    FF Results Summary Table

    Css3
    ie.microsoft.com 136 seconds
    css3test.com 56% (500/937)
    tools.css3.info 41/41 574/574
    acid3 100/100
    Html5
    html5test 393/500 (+10)
    wapsbttest2 129/160
    peacekeeper1 798 (5/7)
    peacekeeper21514 (5/7)


    Opera 12.14


    In order not to clog the post with a mass of pictures, I will post only the final table.
    Css3
    ie.microsoft.com 16 seconds
    css3test.com 58% (451/937)
    tools.css3.info 41/41 574/574
    acid3 100/100
    Html5
    html5test 404/500 (+9)
    wapsbttest2 146/160
    peacekeeper1 2441 (2/7)
    peacekeeper2 2522 (4/7)


    Chrome 24.0.1312.57


    Css3
    ie.microsoft.com 6.9 seconds
    css3test.com 63% (562/937)
    tools.css3.info 41/41 574/574
    acid3 100/100
    Html5
    html5test 448/500 (+13)
    wapsbttest2 148/160
    peacekeeper1 1734 (6/7)
    peacekeeper2 3127 (6/7)


    IE 9.0.8112.16421 64-bit


    Css3
    ie.microsoft.com 22 seconds
    css3test.com 33% (274/937)
    tools.css3.info 41/41 574/574
    acid3 100/100
    Html5
    html5test 138/500 (+5)
    wapsbttest2 91/160
    peacekeeper1 998 (3/7)
    peacekeeper2 1001 (3/7)


    IE 10.0.9200.16438 64-bit


    Css3
    ie.microsoft.com 24 seconds
    css3test.com 54% (444/937)
    tools.css3.info 41/41 574/574
    acid3 100/100
    Html5
    html5test 320/500 (+6)
    wapsbttest2 127/160
    peacekeeper1 1882 (3/7)
    peacekeeper2 1882 (3/7)


    Safary Version 6.0.2 (8536.26.17), max osx 10.8


    Thanks btd for Safari results
    Css3
    ie.microsoft.com 6.9 seconds
    css3test.com 55% (500/937)
    tools.css3.info 41/41 574/574
    acid3 100/100
    Html5
    html5test 378/500 (+8)
    wapsbttest2 139/160
    peacekeeper1 3117 (3/6)
    peacekeeper2 3117 (3/6)


    Conclusions and total for all



    Surprised test for peacekeepers, the guys tried. An interesting fact is that the 1st launch of the test is very different from the 2nd, maybe the cache affects this, but the question is very controversial.
    It was also very strange to see the exit algorithm from the maze in FF, Opera, Chrome and the same exit algorithm was there, but IE wasn’t looking for easy ways and didn’t go like everyone else (although it ran the test 3-4 times the same maze ) The final table is probably the best, and then the devil will break his leg, in general, see for yourself:

    BrowserFfOperaChromeIEIE10Safari
    Css3
    ie.microsoft.com136 seconds16 seconds6.9 seconds22 seconds24 seconds6.9 seconds
    css3test.com 56% (500/937)58% (451/937)63% (562/937)33% (274/937)54% (444/937)55% (500/937)
    tools.css3.info41/41 574/574 41/41 574/574 41/41 574/574 41/41 574/574 41/41 574/574 41/41 574/574
    acid3 100/100100/100100/100100/100100/100100/100
    Html5
    html5test393/500 (+10)404/500 (+9)448/500 (+13)138/500 (+5)320/500 (+6)378/500 (+8)
    wapsbttest2 129/160146/160148/16091/160 127/160139/160
    peacekeeper1798 (3/7) 2441 (2/7)1734 (6/7)998 (3/7) 1820 (3/7)3117 (3/7)
    peacekeeper 1514 (5/7)2522 (4/7)3127 (6/7)1001 (3/7)1882 (3/7) 3117 (3/7)


    PS Nobody is perfect, spelling and mistakes are welcome in PM.
    PPS If anyone has a desire, test Safari.

    PPPS Added by IE10 surprised in part, but only in part ...
    Thanks btd for Safari results

    PPPPS sent a friend IE10 results under win8

    Css3
    ie.microsoft.com 16 seconds
    css3test.com 54% (444/937)
    tools.css3.info 41/41 574/574
    acid3 100/100
    Html5
    html5test 320/500 (+6)
    wapsbttest2 127/160
    peacekeeper1 3476 (2/7))

    Only registered users can participate in the survey. Please come in.

    Which browser are you using?

    • 25.2% Firefox 363
    • 52% Chrome 747
    • 16% Opera 231
    • 2.4% Safari 35
    • 3.1% IE 45
    • 1% Others 15

    Also popular now: