retrospective

    start-up

    At first, you react painfully to criticism of your work, resist, prove and justify yourself.

    You love the result of your work and understand that the really bad parts need to be redone. You react to criticism of trifles (is it really that important?).

    By publishing the result, you add reservations - they say the first product, made in a day (although puffed for 2 weeks) and are looking for leniency. Looking for worthless praise.

    You understand that it was done poorly before it was finished.

    When indicating errors, you understand that they indicate something about which he himself is in the know (there simply was no time).

    To the question “why it doesn’t work,” you answer “because it is my mistake.”

    When you ask yourself “why it doesn’t work”, you understand the reason and correct it.

    Not knowing how to solve a problem, you openly ask about it. Realizing that you did poorly, you ask the rest how to do better.

    Your opinions are well-reasoned, but so flexible that with a better argument you quickly change your position and do not lose time.

    You know why odnoklassniki in navigation is better than linkedin, but you don’t prove it.

    You correct mistakes for colleagues and do not tell anyone about it.

    You are looking for the root cause of your final task and think how it can be solved more effectively.

    You know that each user of Habrahabr has passed at least three stages of the above

    ...

    Also popular now: