retrospective

start-up

At first, you react painfully to criticism of your work, resist, prove and justify yourself.
↓
You love the result of your work and understand that the really bad parts need to be redone. You react to criticism of trifles (is it really that important?).
↓
By publishing the result, you add reservations - they say the first product, made in a day (although puffed for 2 weeks) and are looking for leniency. Looking for worthless praise.
↓
You understand that it was done poorly before it was finished.
↓
When indicating errors, you understand that they indicate something about which he himself is in the know (there simply was no time).
↓
To the question “why it doesn’t work,” you answer “because it is my mistake.”
↓
When you ask yourself “why it doesn’t work”, you understand the reason and correct it.
↓
Not knowing how to solve a problem, you openly ask about it. Realizing that you did poorly, you ask the rest how to do better.
↓
Your opinions are well-reasoned, but so flexible that with a better argument you quickly change your position and do not lose time.
↓
You know why odnoklassniki in navigation is better than linkedin, but you don’t prove it.
↓
You correct mistakes for colleagues and do not tell anyone about it.
↓
You are looking for the root cause of your final task and think how it can be solved more effectively.
↓
You know that each user of Habrahabr has passed at least three stages of the above
↓
...