Private property <> Intellectual property

In the article Why descendants of today's copyright holders are cursed , one good phrase was said:

In support of the requirements, the theses on private property are used as the basis of modern society, its sacred nature is emphasized

That is, copywriters put pressure on the fact that intellectual property is the same private property.
But on the other hand - like that - they immediately go into the bushes and yell that these are completely different things!

Let’s try to analyze whether there is at least some relation between intellectual property and private property ?!



Here, for example, we buy a bicycle and some song, as it is and how copywriters want:

	Bike	Song
Purchase	Having bought a bicycle, we become its OWNERS	Having bought a song, we do not become the owner of the song. Yes, yes, even the “bought” copy!
Sale	You can sell your purchased bike to anyone. In any country in the world. Though in space!	You have no right to sell the purchased song. Just because no one sold it to you in fact - see the previous paragraph.
Using	You can ride your bike honestly bought anywhere, if it does not violate public order and safety.	You cannot listen to the song you bought in those places where God forbid anyone other than you can hear it! If they hear, this is a violation of the right to intellectual property!
Travels	You can take your purchased bicycle with you to any country in the world where you can generally get with such baggage.	A purchased song can only be used in the country where you purchased it. Do not believe? Recall DVD zone!
The right to "spare parts"	You can disassemble the purchased bike and assemble a bicycle from its parts. Or sell pedals to Uncle Van from Nizhny Tagil, and wheels to a boy from Saudi Arabia via E-Bay!	From the song you bought, you have no right to even remix or a parody! About to sell couplets to different people, I am silent!
The right to quality	If the bike creaks right from the store, it’s difficult to turn the steering wheel, and the pedals are like torture devices - you have the right to return it to the store within 14 days. Yes, yes, even with such a subjective parameter as “The seat rubs my ass!” !!!	You have no right to buy the song you bought, in which the performer fakes, creaks and rubs his brains with his howls !!! Unlike a bicycle, a song is considered to be nearly “dead” after even a partial listening! And in general - do not like it - do not buy more! And we won’t refund the money!
Taxes	Bicycle manufacturers do not require deductions of 1% of roads under construction, sports uniforms sold, etc. etc. based on the fact that they can be used for cycling. And, yes, with drivers for the fact that the manufacturer’s bike can potentially move, they also do not require deductions!	Yes, yes, I'm talking about the same "Migalkovsky percent"! Yes, and from carriers. Yes, and from computers. And from the media in computers, where without it? And from cars, because There is a radio on which you can listen to the media. No radio? Pay all the same, because there is a potential opportunity to put the car!
Theft	The manufacturer made a million bicycles at 100 bucks at cost. He sold 999,000 units, 999 were not sold, one was stolen. Loss of theft from a manufacturer? From 100 to 150 bucks, how to count.	The producer wrote one song. Keep silent about the cost. Sold 999,000 copies of it for 10 bucks. One is spirals. Loss of manufacturer from stolen ??? “One hundred thousand million, because we expected to sell just that much, which means we did not sell them precisely because of the vile pirates !!! Let them pay us for lost profits !!! ”

“How can you compare! These are completely different things! Here the farmer grows carrots, and he has harvested the crop! ”
Okay, let's figure it out on a carrot:

	Carrot	Film
Production	The farmer spent a million bucks bought seeds, sowed carrots, raised it. Carrots grew to ... and five more.	The director banged a million bucks and made a movie. No "and five more" - stupidly one film. Total.
Sale	Farmer in bulk sold the entire crop to a dealer for two million.	The director sold the tape for five lemons. He’s not such a sucker as a farmer, in order to get only 100% profit!
Spread	Let’s conditionally assume that the total yield was one million kilograms. The store sold carrots at five bucks a kilo, but a thousand pounds rotted while lying on the shelves, and another five hundred pounds were carried by old women in their sleeves.	The film was watched by a million people with tickets for 20 bucks, plus a lot of DVD DVDs sold with the movie, plus how a reasonable person distributor made his small business selling souvenirs, plus toys based on the movie ... And several thousand people downloaded the movie from torrents. Oh! What a nightmare! They are criminals worse than carrying carrots! After all, carrots can not be resold with margin hundreds of times what were the costs of its production !!!
Purchase	You bought carrots until you ate it or it rotted - you own carrots. However, even if it rotted - you are the owner of a rotten carrot!	You bought a movie disc. Or a movie ticket. You do not become the owner of the purchased movie - only the disc, and even then “conditionally”. About the ticket to the cinema, which often costs more than a movie disc, I am silent - this is generally a “sound of money”!
Consumer protection	If you bought the "best carrots", as it appears in the advertisement, and they sold rot to you, you have the right to protect your interests.	If you were sold a ticket for the “best movie” and you were shown rot - nobody will protect your interests. “For this is a subjective opinion - Uncle Vasya, whom we paid with a bottle of vodka for the examination, does not consider him rot!”
Manufacturer Responsibility	If the carrot is announced as “suitable for children from 6 years old,” and the child has gone astray from this transgenic infection, the producer is liable up to the criminal one.	If you came with a child to a film with a rating of “From 6 years old”, and there dinosaurs with blood are eating people, and during breaks the main character is e ... t of people around, starting from pensioners and ending with dinosaurs - the producer is not responsible!
Right to use	You can eat the carrots you bought, you can squeeze the juice out of it, you can even sell this juice or stick the carrots in yours ... for sexual pleasure and make the film "How do I put carrots where I don’t need to!" Neither the farmer nor the store can forbid you from doing this.	You have the right to watch the purchased disc with the film yourself. All. You don’t have the right to show it to friends, to set up a cinema in which you can watch a movie for money, too. And God forbid, you’ll shoot the video “How do I pop a disc where I don’t need to!” To begin with, it hurts, ending up with the copyright holders tearing up the rest of the hole for using their disk without their permission!
Taxes	The carrot manufacturer does not require a percentage from the manufacturers of pots and pans, because they can be used to make carrots!	Yes, yes, I’m talking about MIGALKOVSKY PERCENT again!

“Ahh! SAMDURAK, UNDERSTANDING UNDERSTANDING, FOR EVERYTHING IS DIFFERENTLY SIMPLY TINNITUALLY UNDERSTANDING AND EXAMPLES UNSUCCESSFUL AND IN GENERAL I WILL NOT ARGUE AS SO SAMURURE IS UNDERWEAR! - declares copyrights and dumps ...

Resume?
Guys, what kind of resume is needed after the above ?!