Consumer drama

    I decided to duplicate the post I wrote on another blog. Still, you need to share experience so that other people do not fall into similar situations.


    Background


    In the fall of 2006, I bought an Asus A8JC laptop from Pragma . This is a fairly large network of computer equipment stores in the Volga region.
    After a couple of months, the hinges of the lid began to fall apart. Within two years, these loops were repaired several times, then they fell apart again, then they were repaired again, then they again fell apart.
    I could not return it immediately after several months of purchase, since by law it was supposed to be a second marriage.

    Courts


    After the third time, I came to the store and demanded that I get the money back. There were long negotiations, then a long correspondence, which did not lead to anything. Then I sued them. At the trial, it turned out that the company had already closed, transferring all its obligations to the successor company. As it turned out, this company is located in another city in the industrial zone.

    After the first trial, there was a second trial, but on their own initiative. According to the results of the second, I must return the laptop to this company. That is, I can’t sell it, I have to give it to the bailiffs.

    Bailiffs and prosecutors


    I won the trial more than a year ago, but no one was going to return my money to me. I had to write to the prosecutor to mess up the bailiffs.

    And this week the bailiffs sent me a letter - they returned the writ of execution. They cannot return the money to me, because there is nobody at the address of the legal successor company.

    And another answer came from the prosecutor's office:
    Requests were made to state registration authorities. According to the answer from the Federal Tax Service Inspectorate for the Industrial District, the debtor organization is not registered. According to the answers from the RTI, the Fed, the traffic police, the property listed for Everest LLC was not revealed. According to the exit certificate at the address indicated in the executive document, it was established that the organization at the address of Samara, Management Deadlock, 3 is not located.

    Conclusion


    The pragma in which I bought a laptop develops, works under the previous brand, advertising hangs throughout the city. People who sold me this laptop work there and even look pretty good.

    52581 p. They didn’t return me, having stopped the enforcement proceedings, and by the decision of the second court I should return the laptop.

    Afterword


    Those who believe that all this hemorrhoids are mistaken. The whole process took almost no time and money. Of the costs, only 500 p. notarization of a power of attorney to a lawyer and even lower costs for registered letters.
    I urge you to fight for your rights, sue, exchange experiences and “glorify” such stores.

    Also popular now: