March 31, 2010 at 00:57ExtDesigner - we feel with pens
We are testing a fresh ExtDesigner for more than 200 non-Russian presidents on the subject of sanity and generally what it is and why
I must say that I can’t use ExtJS ohms, but the read docks left a pretty good impression.
I will test on a Gentoo Linux 64-bit assembly,
download the ExtDesigner, put the
installer in In the form of a binary with a GUI interface,swearing to the inventors
proposes to putsuch a miracle in ~, but it allows you to choose a different location (I put it in / home / tz-lom / software / ExtDesigner)
after installation it can even be launched and broken off who could to think it over, it is written in QT and QT goes into it, it’s a pity not all, to determine that there is a fresh kit in the system, but it does not matter
mmm, what about ./lib? mdya, the ChSV was off scale and some strange postfixes were attached to the names (why?), well, fix it: it turned out, the softinka started up and immediately asked for registration from the forum, we quickly quit on the forum and run the form with the only button “create I won’t show the project ”, but the main window looks like this: the interface is completely borrowed from QTCreator, which in principle is not bad * 7 minutes have passed * no, everything is bad , it was said earlier thatthis rubbish was done on a flex based on ExtJS handlers,
and so, in this prog QT used to dialogs and ... and everything !!!
not, of course, the idea of making an editor based on editable crap is a cool idea, the same QTCreator is written on QT,
but who said that this should be so buggy? for example, how many forms will there be, one or 3? in fact, one glitch crawls out of all holes, constant error messages do not add convenience for work to do something more Hellow World will require the ability to “whip to death more than 9000 pop-up error windows” on the output, in theory, the softink gives a JS code or JSON array to choose from, but I don’t know how to get to the exit. Of course, it can be said that dissecting software for compatibility with some kind of Linux will greatly affect its performance, but do you have to pay back the 219 Bachinsky ones?
necessary, I recommend beer and croutons, with them the development process for ExtJS will go faster than using Ext Designer, this is obvious
on this great idea I keep a post
I must say that I can’t use ExtJS ohms, but the read docks left a pretty good impression.
I will test on a Gentoo Linux 64-bit assembly,
download the ExtDesigner, put the
installer in In the form of a binary with a GUI interface,
proposes to put
after installation it can even be launched and broken off who could to think it over, it is written in QT and QT goes into it, it’s a pity not all, to determine that there is a fresh kit in the system, but it does not matter
tz-lom@tzhome ~/software/ExtDesigner $ ./bin/ExtDesigner
bin/ExtDesigner.bin: /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8: no version information available (required by bin/ExtDesigner.bin)
Cannot mix incompatible Qt libraries
tz-lom@tzhome ~/software/ExtDesigner $ ls
Ext Designer.desktop Uninstall Ext Designer.desktop bin lib logo.png plugins uninstall
mmm, what about ./lib? mdya, the ChSV was off scale and some strange postfixes were attached to the names (why?), well, fix it: it turned out, the softinka started up and immediately asked for registration from the forum, we quickly quit on the forum and run the form with the only button “create I won’t show the project ”, but the main window looks like this: the interface is completely borrowed from QTCreator, which in principle is not bad * 7 minutes have passed * no, everything is bad , it was said earlier that
tz-lom@tzhome ~/software/ExtDesigner $ ls ./lib/
libQtCoreExt.so.4 libQtNetworkExt.so.4 libQtWebKitExt.so.4 libQtXmlPatternsExt.so.4
libQtGuiExt.so.4 libQtScriptExt.so.4 libQtXmlExt.so.4
mv ./lib ./lib_wtf
for i in $(ls ./lib_wtf/); do ln -s /usr/lib64/qt4/${i//Ext/} ./lib/$i; done
not, of course, the idea of making an editor based on editable crap is a cool idea, the same QTCreator is written on QT,
but who said that this should be so buggy? for example, how many forms will there be, one or 3? in fact, one glitch crawls out of all holes, constant error messages do not add convenience for work to do something more Hellow World will require the ability to “whip to death more than 9000 pop-up error windows” on the output, in theory, the softink gives a JS code or JSON array to choose from, but I don’t know how to get to the exit. Of course, it can be said that dissecting software for compatibility with some kind of Linux will greatly affect its performance, but do you have to pay back the 219 Bachinsky ones?
necessary, I recommend beer and croutons, with them the development process for ExtJS will go faster than using Ext Designer, this is obvious
on this great idea I keep a post
tz-lom@tzhome ~/software/ExtDesigner $ cd ..
tz-lom@tzhome ~/software $ rm -R ./ExtDesigner/
tz-lom@tzhome ~/software $
