October 14, 2008 at 01:06School portal and Web3.0.
The theme of the school portal has already been imposed on the teeth, but it’s worth adding some rational grain to this series of five-minute hates.
To begin with, such a phenomenon as a school portal is not necessary in principle.
The fact is that the portals themselves are a relic of the past and an unpromising pastime. What constitutes a portal is a collection of little by little, designed to disperse the user's attention as long as possible, thereby keeping it within the framework of one site, which will allow centrally selling ads.
The ability to concentrate on the average child and, as a rule, tend to zero, and the sale of advertising, with the right approach, is not included in the goal of the “school portal”.
And it is the goal of the school portal, as well as school education in general, to crystallize the addictions and abilities of an individual person, to any field of activity. Well, to give some intellectual background, which, as shown by the biographies of many prominent personalities, is the tenth thing.
Thus, the presence of one tremendous portal that illuminates the entire difficult path of a modern student from the timetable to the disco is not only unnecessary, but harmful.
We can see this on the example of the recently announced Planet of Schools, which has the same relation to the learning process as the Yeralash newsreel.
So we leave aside abstracts, teacher’s pearls, gadgets and other joys of life, in full accordance with the law of non-decreasing entropy, the tasks of personal dullness are easily solved by a person and without outside help.
This raises the question of whether the schoolchildren need the Internet at all, the answer is not surprising: yes it is. A network (along with a toilet) is one of the few places where a person is left alone. Even smart adults who have gathered in a group of more than three, are a deplorable sight, what can we say about children: everyone who is not lucky to meet a school trip on the street, imagines what a nightmare it is. In this case, a single individual is usually sane, regardless of age.
If we visit the school portal, not mentioned by night, we will notice quite distinct problems with the content there. On the main page there are articles with headings written in such an official language that it is hard to imagine a daredevil who is ready to risk mental health and follow the link.
In fact, the content is not such a big problem, because, firstly, there are a lot of teachers keen on their subject, and secondly, we inherited from the Soviet empire a huge number of motley museums where people who know the issue and work extremely enthusiastic people (there is simply no other reason to work in the museum with the current level of salaries). This is despite the fact that in museums there are mountains and collapses of excellently systematized "content", which are just waiting to be digitized.
If you think that museums are a surprisingly boring place covered with dust, where severe aunties-caretakers hide behind the folds of curtains, then you are deeply mistaken. Most likely you either, within the framework of cultural service, once gloomily wandered from exhibit to exhibit at a conscious age, or at the last went there with your beloved classmates ©, which, as mentioned above, is hell.
It is known that any school tour is quickly organized into a mobile social network, the intellectual level of which is slightly lower than that of the most stupid participant.
A slight lyrical digression: what nevertheless encouraged me to write this text. The fact is that this Sunday, dodging around the Teply Stan metro station, I came across a museum of paleontology. Fate on the Teply Stan brought me for the first time in 25 years, deciding that most likely another 25 will pass before I get here a second time, I was able to go see the skeletons of dinosaurs. Having walked through two halls, I came across a passing tour and, attracted by an inescapable craving for a freebie, pretended that I was here for a reason. The great thing is that it turned out to be wildly interesting, for which a special thank you to the guide. And this is not the first time that, given a good storyteller, a seemingly boring event, it became very interesting.
Well, back to our rams, the problem is that all these wonderful people are completely ignorant of site building, and most of the existing sites are worthy examples of "folk" design and, it’s scary to say, are inappropriately made up. All this bacchanalia is accompanied by complicated texts, and even not rich illustrations.
Thus, most sites need the professional hands of a professional, and since we are counting on the younger generation, whose representatives cannot sit for a long time, not to read, in this case (unlike one “site for intellectuals”) flash will be more than appropriate.
Now, where to get these professionals, glory to the global financial crisis, the flow of very useful sites about mutual funds, mortgages and promotions will obviously decline in the near future, so the state order will be very much even for many web studios. It should be borne in mind that, from the point of view of logic (hussars being silent), increased competition leads to higher quality, and many will be interested in having a good complex project in their portfolio, with which it will be possible to explain to the customer that if the studio was able to interestingly and colorfully illuminate questions of molecular chemistry, the site for Super Dumplings will undoubtedly find a response in the hearts of potential eaters.
The state, by the way, will finally be able to report how it has remarkably supported small and medium-sized businesses.
Now a little about what does web3.0 have to do with it. In addition to the usual temptation, designed to cause increased salivation of readers, this is quite an integral concept. Recall that web3.0. is a social network of robots, and robots, as you know, are much kinder, smarter and more humane than humans.
The main idea of web3.0. is the automation of interaction and information transfer between sites, this idea is perfectly applicable within the framework of our “spread” portal: any fourth-grader knows that science is interconnected. Biology is associated with chemistry, chemistry with physics, physics with mathematics, and mathematics with anything.
Thus, in order to clarify some point related to related science, our small site can turn to another small site and draw out a hint on this topic. That is, a site dedicated to Pushkin’s creativity may ask the site of the historical circle for a brief reference on the Decembrists. To steer these requests will be just the notorious "school portal", which, thank God, no one will see.
Thus, by the method of successive iterations, our weighted average shell will be able to reach the area in which he will be able to fully realize himself, which, as I wrote at the very beginning, is the goal of our entire secondary education.
By the way, at the same time we kill the third hare, namely, we finally create a semantic network, which sharply moves us forward, and the googol will be on our premises.
Now about the sad, firstly, the developers are also rare boobies, which can be seen on the example of 99% of domestic sites, and the task set requires not only professionalism, but also a lot of involvement. The only way that I see it is to call a hypnotist and identify which items our developer was interested in as a child, well, or if he was not interested in anything other than girls and inserts, give him a setting for organic chemistry.
On a studio scale, the principle is as follows, since we have small projects then give them to each studio, and then, within the framework of the “Scholl site web award”, to separate the lambs from the goats with the help of expert advice (since we have an expert at habrahabr, every first) . Based on the results, the winners should be given the next project, and the losers should be sent to felling.
And the saddest thing is the mind of the nation’s honor and conscience, our priceless officials who unfortunately think in two categories: cutting ribbons and cutting the budget. Since each project is quite small, you won’t cut the ribbon and don’t cut the money, so I'm afraid this idea will not cause much enthusiasm.
To begin with, such a phenomenon as a school portal is not necessary in principle.
The fact is that the portals themselves are a relic of the past and an unpromising pastime. What constitutes a portal is a collection of little by little, designed to disperse the user's attention as long as possible, thereby keeping it within the framework of one site, which will allow centrally selling ads.
The ability to concentrate on the average child and, as a rule, tend to zero, and the sale of advertising, with the right approach, is not included in the goal of the “school portal”.
And it is the goal of the school portal, as well as school education in general, to crystallize the addictions and abilities of an individual person, to any field of activity. Well, to give some intellectual background, which, as shown by the biographies of many prominent personalities, is the tenth thing.
Thus, the presence of one tremendous portal that illuminates the entire difficult path of a modern student from the timetable to the disco is not only unnecessary, but harmful.
We can see this on the example of the recently announced Planet of Schools, which has the same relation to the learning process as the Yeralash newsreel.
So we leave aside abstracts, teacher’s pearls, gadgets and other joys of life, in full accordance with the law of non-decreasing entropy, the tasks of personal dullness are easily solved by a person and without outside help.
This raises the question of whether the schoolchildren need the Internet at all, the answer is not surprising: yes it is. A network (along with a toilet) is one of the few places where a person is left alone. Even smart adults who have gathered in a group of more than three, are a deplorable sight, what can we say about children: everyone who is not lucky to meet a school trip on the street, imagines what a nightmare it is. In this case, a single individual is usually sane, regardless of age.
If we visit the school portal, not mentioned by night, we will notice quite distinct problems with the content there. On the main page there are articles with headings written in such an official language that it is hard to imagine a daredevil who is ready to risk mental health and follow the link.
In fact, the content is not such a big problem, because, firstly, there are a lot of teachers keen on their subject, and secondly, we inherited from the Soviet empire a huge number of motley museums where people who know the issue and work extremely enthusiastic people (there is simply no other reason to work in the museum with the current level of salaries). This is despite the fact that in museums there are mountains and collapses of excellently systematized "content", which are just waiting to be digitized.
If you think that museums are a surprisingly boring place covered with dust, where severe aunties-caretakers hide behind the folds of curtains, then you are deeply mistaken. Most likely you either, within the framework of cultural service, once gloomily wandered from exhibit to exhibit at a conscious age, or at the last went there with your beloved classmates ©, which, as mentioned above, is hell.
It is known that any school tour is quickly organized into a mobile social network, the intellectual level of which is slightly lower than that of the most stupid participant.
A slight lyrical digression: what nevertheless encouraged me to write this text. The fact is that this Sunday, dodging around the Teply Stan metro station, I came across a museum of paleontology. Fate on the Teply Stan brought me for the first time in 25 years, deciding that most likely another 25 will pass before I get here a second time, I was able to go see the skeletons of dinosaurs. Having walked through two halls, I came across a passing tour and, attracted by an inescapable craving for a freebie, pretended that I was here for a reason. The great thing is that it turned out to be wildly interesting, for which a special thank you to the guide. And this is not the first time that, given a good storyteller, a seemingly boring event, it became very interesting.
Well, back to our rams, the problem is that all these wonderful people are completely ignorant of site building, and most of the existing sites are worthy examples of "folk" design and, it’s scary to say, are inappropriately made up. All this bacchanalia is accompanied by complicated texts, and even not rich illustrations.
Thus, most sites need the professional hands of a professional, and since we are counting on the younger generation, whose representatives cannot sit for a long time, not to read, in this case (unlike one “site for intellectuals”) flash will be more than appropriate.
Now, where to get these professionals, glory to the global financial crisis, the flow of very useful sites about mutual funds, mortgages and promotions will obviously decline in the near future, so the state order will be very much even for many web studios. It should be borne in mind that, from the point of view of logic (hussars being silent), increased competition leads to higher quality, and many will be interested in having a good complex project in their portfolio, with which it will be possible to explain to the customer that if the studio was able to interestingly and colorfully illuminate questions of molecular chemistry, the site for Super Dumplings will undoubtedly find a response in the hearts of potential eaters.
The state, by the way, will finally be able to report how it has remarkably supported small and medium-sized businesses.
Now a little about what does web3.0 have to do with it. In addition to the usual temptation, designed to cause increased salivation of readers, this is quite an integral concept. Recall that web3.0. is a social network of robots, and robots, as you know, are much kinder, smarter and more humane than humans.
The main idea of web3.0. is the automation of interaction and information transfer between sites, this idea is perfectly applicable within the framework of our “spread” portal: any fourth-grader knows that science is interconnected. Biology is associated with chemistry, chemistry with physics, physics with mathematics, and mathematics with anything.
Thus, in order to clarify some point related to related science, our small site can turn to another small site and draw out a hint on this topic. That is, a site dedicated to Pushkin’s creativity may ask the site of the historical circle for a brief reference on the Decembrists. To steer these requests will be just the notorious "school portal", which, thank God, no one will see.
Thus, by the method of successive iterations, our weighted average shell will be able to reach the area in which he will be able to fully realize himself, which, as I wrote at the very beginning, is the goal of our entire secondary education.
By the way, at the same time we kill the third hare, namely, we finally create a semantic network, which sharply moves us forward, and the googol will be on our premises.
Now about the sad, firstly, the developers are also rare boobies, which can be seen on the example of 99% of domestic sites, and the task set requires not only professionalism, but also a lot of involvement. The only way that I see it is to call a hypnotist and identify which items our developer was interested in as a child, well, or if he was not interested in anything other than girls and inserts, give him a setting for organic chemistry.
On a studio scale, the principle is as follows, since we have small projects then give them to each studio, and then, within the framework of the “Scholl site web award”, to separate the lambs from the goats with the help of expert advice (since we have an expert at habrahabr, every first) . Based on the results, the winners should be given the next project, and the losers should be sent to felling.
And the saddest thing is the mind of the nation’s honor and conscience, our priceless officials who unfortunately think in two categories: cutting ribbons and cutting the budget. Since each project is quite small, you won’t cut the ribbon and don’t cut the money, so I'm afraid this idea will not cause much enthusiasm.