April 16, 2007 at 17:085 minutes of fame
Not so long ago, I wrote about one “useless” project - 5 minutes of fame . More precisely, I didn’t write, but I asked the respected public how to reduce its uselessness :) .
To my surprise, there were many answers that dimm and I naturally read and analyzed. Most of your ideas were interesting, but they somewhat diverted the project from the original idea and thus did not exactly match its name.
After drinking beer and thinking, we decided to “complicate” the project a bit. First of all, we introduced timeouts between entering messages and added the ability to vote, thereby increasing or decreasing the message “hanging” time.
Naturally, the opportunity has now appearedView top rated posts .
Well, and where without them - a cloud of popular words . I’ll immediately notice that we do not have censorship :).
Well, the last change is a slight change in design.
We are waiting for your criticism and advice :).
PS If no one is against, then transferred to the blog WEB 2.0
To my surprise, there were many answers that dimm and I naturally read and analyzed. Most of your ideas were interesting, but they somewhat diverted the project from the original idea and thus did not exactly match its name.
After drinking beer and thinking, we decided to “complicate” the project a bit. First of all, we introduced timeouts between entering messages and added the ability to vote, thereby increasing or decreasing the message “hanging” time.
Naturally, the opportunity has now appearedView top rated posts .
Well, and where without them - a cloud of popular words . I’ll immediately notice that we do not have censorship :).
Well, the last change is a slight change in design.
We are waiting for your criticism and advice :).
PS If no one is against, then transferred to the blog WEB 2.0