Realism - the ideology of the New World

    I put in a public beta test the political system for countries with economies, mainly based on the exploitation of the human capital of engineers and scientists. The current version of the system is 0.9. Constructive criticism and additions are welcome.

    It is now obvious that the old ideologies that guided the political forces of the 19th-20th centuries have completely outlived themselves in the 21st century due to a change in the economic system, the destruction of the proletariat as the main exploited class, and the loss of trust by the old political elites. These processes are associated with the replacement of workers with robotic self-governing systems, the formation of a new massively exploited class of engineers to replace the obsolete proletariat, the emergence of the upper stratum of the social class of engineers as the exploiting class, the strengthening of social inequality directly related to intellectual inequality, and the replacement of investments in capital goods by investing in human capital. Social relationships, types of stratification of society, education system, political and economic ideologies - everything is fundamentally broken when the base underlying the social economy changes. I have already written many times about all these transformations, as well as about the fact that dramatic changes in the field of the widespread introduction of robotics and automation, based on progress in the field of weak Artificial Intelligence, will inevitably lead the old post-industrial world to increasing economic inefficiency and its gradual replacement with the world " knowledge economy ”, by the New World, which creates a significantly larger surplus value per unit of sales. We can say that it is the New World that will be the world that the biblical prophets described under the term “Olam abaa”, however, taking into account how this New World looked like in the refraction of the mentality of people who lived 3000 years ago.

    New realities always require new thinking. Obviously, the old socio-political approaches that worked effectively at the dawn of the industrial era with global changes in the structure of the economy are more unviable. As well as the socio-political approaches inherent in feudalism became unviable during the bourgeois Industrial Revolution and the formation of capitalism, which exploited machines as a means of production and workers as the control circuit of machine tools. Let's think together about exactly what principles need to be laid as the basis of the socio-political system of the New World in order to be adequate to radical changes in the basis of the economy. First we formulate thesis, then we write down each item in more detail.


    A) Rights, obligations, freedoms, responsibility

    1. Every person in society has rights, the volume of which is equal to the responsibilities of a person to society.
    2. Every person in society has freedoms that impose on a person the responsibility for using them.
    3. The scope of rights and freedoms in society is limited, since unlimited rights and freedoms entail, theoretically, unlimited duties and responsibilities, and in reality - unlimited irresponsibility and permissiveness.
    4. The specific rights and obligations of a person to society, as well as freedom and responsibility, are a function of the role that a person voluntarily takes on himself in society.
    5. The state must create and monitor the implementation of the rules governing the specific implementation of the rights and duties, freedoms and responsibilities in society.
    6. Setting the basic parameters of rights and obligations, freedoms and responsibility, is the subject of a social contract.

    B) State authorities

    1. The authorities are separate from each other, their interaction is aimed at the benefit of the entire community of citizens as a whole and is based on competition and cooperation.
    2. The government bodies of the state are formed by means of the anonymous expression of the will of members of the company who have the right to vote, which is accessible for verification by the company and independent observers.
    3. The composition of the supreme judicial authority is formed by the anonymous expression of the will of all members of the society with a higher legal education and vested with the right to vote, which is accessible for verification by the company and independent observers.
    4. The composition of citizens entitled to vote is formed on the basis of a social contract.

    B) Possible options for granting citizens the right to vote

    B1. On the basis of formal signs

    1. On the basis of the citizen's age, as well as the absence of a court decision imposing restrictions on the right to vote (the so-called universal suffrage).
    2. Based on the positive balance of the citizen's contribution to the public good (the amount of taxes paid exceeds the amount of benefits received), as well as the absence of a court decision imposing restrictions on the right to vote. In this case, proportional vesting is also possible - the more taxes are paid, the more votes can be cast in elections.
    3. Based on the ownership of real estate, as well as the absence of a court decision imposing restrictions on the right to vote. In this case, proportional vesting is also possible - the more property there is in the property, the more votes can be cast in elections.
    4. On the basis of the passage of a socially significant service by a citizen, fixed by a social contract, as well as the absence of a judicial decision imposing restrictions on the right to vote (a particular example is technocracy).

    IN 2. Based on informal attributes

    1. On the basis of a specialized open and public judicial examination for the right to vote, a certain amount of time is valid. The essence of the exam is to make sure that the applicant is loyal to society, is aware of the social and political realities of current reality, and is also mentally adequate. The criteria on the basis of which a verdict is issued, as well as the period for which a citizen is given the right to vote, must be the subject of a social contract.
    2. On the basis of the abilities and talents of each individual citizen, as well as the absence of a court decision imposing restrictions on the right to vote (meritocracy). The criteria and mathematical weight of the increase in the number of votes available to a citizen in elections are adopted on the basis of a social contract.

    D) State, society and personality

    1. People are social beings, therefore individuals form a collective, and the collective, as a consequence, forms personalities.
    2. People are divided into collectivists and individualists. Most collectivists strive to obtain the most comfortable position within a team similar in spirit. Most individualists seek freedom from the power of a collective. Individualists are much fewer than collectivists.
    3. Any social structure is a collective personality.
    4. People and social structures are in the process of mutual competition and cooperation.
    5. There should not be personalities that prevail over other personalities, with the exception of parenting children under the age of majority, guardianship of legally incompetent citizens in accordance with a court decision, and cases of voluntary consent to this kind of relationship, subject to cultural and legislative frameworks.
    6. Ideologies based on the idea of ​​the total superiority of one group of people over other groups of people are prohibited. Propaganda of such ideologies is also prohibited.
    7. State for citizen and citizen for state: close horizontal relations based on mutual benefit, replacing outdated vertical relations between citizen and state.
    8. The main function of the state is to ensure the safety of its citizens both on its territory and beyond. Citizens ’duty to security: taxes and law-abiding.
    9. All those who wish death to the state of which they are citizens are automatically deprived of citizenship by decision of the court.
    10. The right to private property is the fundamental right of a citizen of the country, private property itself is inviolable. The duty associated with this right is to protect their private property from encroachment, both independently and with the help of society and the state.
    11. Two main systems of managing people by society: culture (morality, language, value system) and the rule of law (law and enforcement system).
    12. Violence and discrimination are legitimate instruments of the influence of society on its individual members. However, these tools need constant monitoring by the society, as well as adjustment to current realities by the branches of government.
    13. Discrimination is permitted solely on the basis of proven scientific facts and is aimed at protecting society as a whole and its individual members in particular.
    14. Violence is permitted, regulated by the laws of the state and aimed at protecting society as a whole and its individual members in particular.
    15. The competitiveness of the state is based on the private initiative of citizens, therefore society as a whole should support entrepreneurs, as well as provide them with the right to success and the right to failure.
    16. The power of any state is based on the power of self-organization of its citizens in solving internal and external problems of society.
    17. The wealth of the state is determined by those resources that its citizens voluntarily give to non-producing basic areas of public interest: fundamental branches of science, culture and charity.
    18. The stability of the state system is determined by the quality of functioning of “social elevators”, and not by the outdated principles of “social justice” and the irremovability of the vertical of power.
    19. The percentage of citizens working for the state and companies owned by the state should be fixed by a social contract so that the private sector of the economy significantly prevails over the state.
    20. The state is aimed at the benefit of the whole society, therefore, when making decisions, the branches of power should take into account not only the requests of individual citizens and groups of the population, but also the interests of society as a whole. In the event of a conflict of interest and the failure of attempts to conclude a compromise agreement, the decision is made in favor of society. Strict scientific evidence must be at the core of understanding what is good for society.
    21. The adoption of government decisions and the reporting of the state to citizens should be as transparent as possible, with the exception of information whose disclosure could jeopardize the security of individual citizens and the country as a whole.
    22. Social inequality is a consequence of the inequality of the intellectual, educational, motivational and energy, and, therefore, it is fundamentally unresolvable and, therefore, should be an acceptable and legitimate tool for motivating citizens who want to improve their own living conditions.
    23. People can be equal only in the face of the law and culture of the state.
    24. The system of liability for breaking the law carries the idea of ​​preventing a crime.
    25. The degree of responsibility for crimes should be fully consistent with the severity of the consequences. Since, often, the consequences of collective crimes are significantly more significant than single crimes, the punishment should be stronger.
    26. Since a group of people is a collective person, the punishment for crimes committed by such a community should, to one degree or another, concern all its members.

    E) Fundamentals of the New World

    1. At the heart of the New World is a scientific approach to cognition.
    2. The scientific approach to cognition is based on rationalism, skepticism and evidence.
    3. The educational system in society is based on a strictly scientific basis.
    4. The value of rational education and the fullness of knowledge.
    5. The management system of society as a whole and its individual members in particular should be implemented on a scientific basis, taking into account the characteristics of human behavior as a biological species.
    6. The New Age humanism is also based on the full acceptance of human nature as a biological object and is formed on the basis of respect for oneself and other people, as well as the inevitability of punishment for manifesting disrespect to people by individual members of society.
    7. Ideas for improving the economy of the state, society and its individual members, providing for the renunciation of man from his biological roots, are considered inhumane.

    E) The basis of the state, culture, interstate relations

    1. At the heart of any state is a state-forming people or a stable conglomerate of peoples.
    2. Only that nation or a stable conglomeration of nations that is ready and able to take responsibility for its own future has the opportunity to build its own state.
    3. The culture and traditions of the state-forming people or a stable conglomerate of peoples, the so-called "internal culture", lies at the heart of the state. The destruction of domestic culture entails the destruction of the state.
    4. The basis of the sovereignty of any country is the presence of citizens of the country who are ready to kill and die for its safety and independence, as well as the ability to build sustainable political, economic and social processes both within the country and at the interstate level.
    5. Free competition and cooperation of cultures and economies of different countries of the world is the engine of universal progress.
    6. There are cultures more adequate to the economic realities of the New World and, therefore, the states and economies that implement them are more effective. An economy that is more effective is more valuable to the whole world than the rest, so the culture underlying such an economy is also more valuable to the world than others.
    7. Those who come to the country from outside and wish to impose on the state the culture of the place from which they came should be considered disloyal members of society. Society has every right to defend itself against such disloyal members.
    8. Immigrants can live in the country only on conditions of respect for the society that forms its basis, acceptance of the leading role of the culture of this society, language and morality in the state. In fact, this is a relationship based on the host-guest model: the guest respects the hosts, the hosts are hospitable and respect the guest equally.
    9. A visitor can become a citizen of a country by a court decision and only if the basic foundations of the culture, morality and traditions of the society that form the basis of the state are adopted.

    And now in more detail on each of the aspects of the functioning of the state, society and citizens.

    Rights, obligations, freedoms, responsibility

    The basis of any state system is people and society, their relationships. Any member of the community has rights guaranteed by society, tightly connected with the obligations of a person to society. For example, a police officer has more rights in society, because he has more responsibilities, because he voluntarily risks his life, ensuring law and order in a particular region of the state. Also, any member of the community has freedoms provided by society, firmly tied to the responsibility imposed by society for the use of these freedoms. For example, freedom of entrepreneurial activity is tied to responsibility for ensuring that, in the pursuit of profit, business does not harm the entire society as a whole, as happened during, for example, the Great Depression. If during the realization of this or that freedom the subject cannot bear full responsibility for it, then the company will control this type of activity in order to minimize or completely stop the possible damage. Since the scope of human responsibility and obligations to society is limited, the scope of rights and freedoms is also limited. A specific set of rights and obligations, freedoms and responsibility is the subject of a social contract and needs constant fine-tuning for the current economic, political and social realities. A member of the company, voluntarily assuming one or another role, accepts that set of rights and obligations, freedoms and responsibilities imposed by the company. Setting the basic parameters of rights and obligations, freedoms and responsibility, is the subject of a social contract,

    Government authorities

    For the entire system of social contract, it is very important to monitor its implementation and constant adjustment to changing realities. Due to the need for maximum protection of active participants in economic activity, it is necessary to impede as much as possible the forced transfer of objects of their investment into the wrong hands. Therefore, it is necessary to have a system of several independent branches of government that prevents collusion with the aim of taking property from the subject of economic relations. Elections are used to fill the branches of government with responsible and professionally trained people. The authorities are aimed at the benefit of the whole society, their interaction is based on competition and cooperation.

    At the moment, all the highest organs of the judicial system are illegitimate from the point of view of democracy; judges are imposed on society, who are empowered by conspiracy. Therefore, members of the highest judicial body of the country should be elected by secret verified vote by all members of the society who have a higher legal education and are vested with the right to vote.

    Possible options for granting citizens the right to vote

    The following options for forming the composition of citizens having the right to vote are possible:

    A. Based on formal attributes

    1. Based on the citizen's age and the absence of a court decision imposing restrictions on the right to vote (so-called universal suffrage) .
    2. Based on the positive balance of the citizen's contribution to the public good (the amount of taxes paid exceeds the amount of benefits received), as well as the absence of a court decision imposing restrictions on the right to vote. In this case, proportional vesting is also possible - the more taxes are paid, the more votes can be cast in elections.
    3. Based on the ownership of real estate, as well as the absence of a court decision imposing restrictions on the right to vote. In this case, proportional vesting is also possible - the more property there is in the property, the more votes can be cast in elections.
    4. On the basis of a citizen's performance of a socially significant service enshrined in a social contract, as well as the absence of a court decision imposing restrictions on the right to vote (a partial example is technocracy).

    B. On the basis of informal attributes

    1. On the basis of a specialized open trial for obtaining the right to vote, a certain amount of time is valid. The essence of the exam is to make sure that the applicant is loyal to society, is aware of the social and political realities of current reality, and is also mentally adequate. The criteria on the basis of which a verdict is issued, as well as the period for which a citizen is given the right to vote, must be the subject of a social contract.
    2. On the basis of the abilities and talents of each individual citizen, as well as the absence of a court decision imposing restrictions on the right to vote (meritocracy). The criteria and mathematical weight of the increase in the number of votes available to a citizen in elections are adopted on the basis of a social contract.

    Each of the proposed options has its advantages and disadvantages. The choice of a specific way of giving citizens the right to vote is the subject of a social contract.

    State, society and personality

    Personalities form a collective and, as a result, a collective forms personalities. These are inevitable processes due to the social structure of people. People are divided into collectivists and individualists. Most collectivists strive to obtain the most comfortable position within a team similar in spirit. Most individualists seek freedom from the power of a collective. At the same time, individualists are much smaller than collectivists, therefore any society can be represented as a set of groups and communities of collectivists, diluted with a small number of individualists. The formation of the collective takes place on the basis of the similarity of views on the world (ideological clan) or on the territorial principle (territorial clan), the adjustment of people to the views of the team is due to the social program built into most people “accept the opinion of the majority and authorities”, “do not stand out”. This leads to the fact that new socially significant ideas are usually expressed by asocial people, individualists, not subject to the influence of society; these thoughts are accepted by social people, collectivists, after which the formation of a new ideological clan takes place, in which the initial ideas are brought to a state of ideological completeness. The new clan enters into the processes of competition and cooperation with other clans. There should not be personalities and clans totally prevailing over others - this leads to weakening of the internal processes of competition and cooperation. that new socially significant ideas are usually expressed by asocial people, individualists, not subject to the influence of society; these thoughts are accepted by social people, collectivists, after which the formation of a new ideological clan takes place, in which the initial ideas are brought to a state of ideological completeness. The new clan enters into the processes of competition and cooperation with other clans. There should not be personalities and clans totally prevailing over others - this leads to weakening of the internal processes of competition and cooperation. that new socially significant ideas are usually expressed by asocial people, individualists, not subject to the influence of society; these thoughts are accepted by social people, collectivists, after which the formation of a new ideological clan takes place, in which the initial ideas are brought to a state of ideological completeness. The new clan enters into the processes of competition and cooperation with other clans. There should not be personalities and clans totally prevailing over others - this leads to weakening of the internal processes of competition and cooperation. The new clan enters into the processes of competition and cooperation with other clans. There should not be personalities and clans totally prevailing over others - this leads to weakening of the internal processes of competition and cooperation. The new clan enters into the processes of competition and cooperation with other clans. There should not be personalities and clans totally prevailing over others - this leads to weakening of the internal processes of competition and cooperation.

    In the system of relations between the state, society and the person of the New World, the dilemma "state for man or person for state" is absolutely illegitimate, since any social group, including the state, is a collective person, and no person can be subordinate to another person, except for relations parents and children until the latter reaches the age of majority, and also on the basis of voluntary consent of this kind of relationship. Therefore, within the framework of realism, relations between man and the state are equal, horizontal, and not vertical. They are based on mutual benefit, but not mutual humiliation. Hence, the strength of the state in a similar manner to the state is the power of self-organization of the country's citizens, aimed at solving internal and external problems, the country's stability is determined by the quality of functioning of “social elevators”, and the wealth of society as a whole is determined by those resources that citizens voluntarily give to non-productive basic spheres of society's interests: fundamental branches of science, culture and charity. The basis of the system of checks and balances of the state apparatus and society, ensuring horizontal relations between society and the state: separate branches of government, public and non-profit organizations, political parties. Competing and cooperating in order to protect the interests of the country and its citizens, such a system should have, based on its idea, not allow either side to pull the blanket over itself and suppress the others, turning horizontal relations into vertical ones,

    The main function of the state is to ensure the safety of its citizens both on its territory and beyond. In exchange for citizens, tax obligations and law-abiding obligations are imposed. And therefore, any citizen who is recognized by the court to be willing to die for the state should automatically lose citizenship.

    The vast majority of concepts of ideologies of the XIX-XX centuries, such as, for example, “social justice”, are only harmful to the whole society, since they are irrelevant to the changed socio-economic relations in society. In the New World, social inequality is only a continuation of the natural for any community homo sapience inequality of intellectual, educational, motivational and energetic. In conditions of well-established social elevators, any smart, energetic, highly motivated and well (self-educated) person should be able to realize any of his dreams, useful to other people, and be in the upper classes of society. As well as one who is not capable of all of the above, sooner or later, regardless of the initial conditions, must end up in the lower classes of society in relation to its original class. And this is a normal useful natural process that does not need to be disturbed. Society only needs to help the strong become even stronger. The strong ones themselves will later help the weak on a voluntary basis, on the basis of charity, which should also be supported by the state, like any other positive initiative of the country's citizens. Just do not confuse the concept of “strong” with the concept of “rich”, “strong” is an active person who is ready to make mistakes and admit his mistakes, to “fall” and “stand up” in order to develop and grow professionally in order to make his life and the life of others his people are better. The strong ones themselves will later help the weak on a voluntary basis, on the basis of charity, which should also be supported by the state, like any other positive initiative of the country's citizens. Just do not confuse the concept of “strong” with the concept of “rich”, “strong” is an active person who is ready to make mistakes and admit his mistakes, to “fall” and “stand up” in order to develop and grow professionally in order to make his life and the life of others his people are better. The strong ones themselves will later help the weak on a voluntary basis, on the basis of charity, which should also be supported by the state, like any other positive initiative of the country's citizens. Just do not confuse the concept of “strong” with the concept of “rich”, “strong” is an active person who is ready to make mistakes and admit his mistakes, to “fall” and “stand up” in order to develop and grow professionally in order to make his life and the life of others his people are better.

    The right to private property, as well as a set of measures aimed at the implementation of this right, is the basis of the economy and social mechanisms of society. But since each right is accompanied by an obligation, the owner of a private property is obliged to protect the objects in his possession, reducing public costs of protection.

    Freedom of enterprise is the key to the health of the state economy. And therefore, society should fully support private initiative, while ensuring both the right to success and the right to failure.

    The percentage of people working for the state and companies owned by the state should be limited by the social contract. This will inevitably lead to an increase in the efficiency of the work of internal organs of government and administration in the country, as well as the predominance of the private sector over the state.

    In any society, it is necessary to have a management system for its individual members. There are two mechanisms for this: culture and the rule of law. The first regulates members of society “gently”, uniting people in a single language, culture, morality. The second acts more harshly, forcing violators to account for their actions before society. Two types of penalties are applied to violators as protective mechanisms: discrimination and violence. Since both types of penalties are very effective, the state seeks to monopolize them, not encouraging the interpersonal application of these mechanisms. However, discrimination is possible solely on the basis of scientifically proven facts. For example, as an unconditionally discriminatory measure, it is necessary to prohibit women from working in enterprises whose production cycle features are capable of irreversibly harming the eggs, as a result of which the unborn child may suffer. A man is quite capable of working in such enterprises due to differences in the functioning of the reproductive system. The system of violence is built around the protection of society as a whole and its individual members in particular and is regulated by current legislation.

    The system of responsibility for crimes to society has in its essence the task of not so much punishing an offense as preventing an act that violates the law. The degree of responsibility for crimes must fully correspond to the severity of the consequences. Since often the consequences of collective crimes are significantly more significant than single crimes, the punishment should be stronger. Moreover, a stable group of people is a collective person, and therefore, the punishment for crimes committed by such a community should concern, in one form or another, all its members.

    Chauvinism in all its forms is destructive to society. The rapid degradation of any communities built on the principles of total superiority - national, racial, religious - we can observe on numerous examples from history. Also, these ideologies inevitably lead to wars and genocide, numerous killings of dissidents. Therefore, all ideologies based on the idea of ​​the total superiority of some groups of people over others, as well as the promotion of such ideas, should be banned.

    When making decisions, state authorities should take into account not only the requests of citizens and individual groups of the population, but also the interests of the majority of members of society who have the right to vote. In the event of a conflict of interest and failure to conclude a compromise agreement, the decision should be made on the basis of a scientific approach in favor of the long-term benefit of the majority of members of the public who have the right to vote, since it is the foundation of the state in the framework of democracy.

    The adoption of decisions by the state and accountability for them should be as transparent as possible to the citizens of the country, with the exception of information whose disclosure could jeopardize the security of individual citizens and the country as a whole. This is due to horizontal ties between the state and citizens: since the state has great control over citizens and their personal information, then citizens should have great control over the state, its internal information and decisions made.

    New World Basics

    The worldview of engineers and scientists, the main driving forces of the New World, is based on the study and perception of the world as it is, a kind of “devotion to reality”. This fundamentally distinguishes them from the humanitarian intelligentsia, which perceives the world through the prism of what the world should become in order to be an ideal place to live. That's why all utopias were written by humanitarian intellectuals, not by scientists or engineers. It follows that the essence of the New World is a scientific perception of the world based on skepticism, rationalism and evidence. And this fundamentally distinguishes the approach of realism from the approach of, for example, liberalism, which interprets evidence as "I have the right to have an opinion, but I am not obliged to prove it, however, if you mind me, you must prove your point of view."

    The scientific world is based on the principle of the value of rational education and the fullness of knowledge. Irrational beliefs can be valuable for specific people, but not for the whole society as a whole, since all people are different and cannot believe in the same thing at the same time. Society as a whole needs to defend itself against the irrational, but at the same time let its members believe in what they themselves consider necessary. Also, it is the completeness of knowledge that allows a person to really understand a particular issue, which helps tremendously not to get confused and not to be confused by powerful manipulators and demagogues.

    Over the past 50 thousand years, people have not changed much as a biological species, therefore, all social experiments of the 20th century that were contrary to human nature failed, taking millions and millions of victims with them to the grave. Therefore, all social ideas that require a person to "overcome his nature", "grow above himself, a kind of monkey" should be considered inhumane, as a result of which it is dangerous and forbidden. And the humanism of the New Time itself is significantly different from its post-Christian reading. Humanism is respect for oneself and other people, as well as the inevitability of punishment for disrespect for people by individual members of society.

    The basis of the state, culture, interstate relations

    At the heart of any state lies the core, state-forming people or a stable conglomerate of peoples. Unlike liberal nationalism, which assumes the right of every nation to have its own state, in reality only those nations and stable conglomerations that are ready and able to take responsibility for their own future get the opportunity to create it. As history shows, everyone else, even getting the right and help to create their own state, inevitably comes to the complete collapse of the economy, civil or tribal wars, total denationalization. The illusion of the right of any people to their state is paid for by human lives of innocent people, which is also inhumane. The basis of the sovereignty of any country is the presence of citizens of the country who are ready to kill and die for its safety and independence, as well as the ability to build sustainable economic and social processes both domestically and at the interstate level. Any nation or a stable conglomeration of peoples, creating its own state, puts its culture and traditions at its core, creating the internal culture of the state. Any alien who brings his culture and tries to impose it on the rest of the country's population is a person who destroys the foundations of the state, since the destruction of the country's internal culture leads to the destruction of the state. The state has every right to defend itself against such people. creating the internal culture of the state. Any alien who brings his culture and tries to impose it on the rest of the country's population is a person who destroys the foundations of the state, since the destruction of the country's internal culture leads to the destruction of the state. The state has every right to defend itself against such people. creating the internal culture of the state. Any alien who brings his culture and tries to impose it on the rest of the country's population is a person who destroys the foundations of the state, since the destruction of the country's internal culture leads to the destruction of the state. The state has every right to defend itself against such people.
    An immigrant can come to the country only on the basis of the host-guest model, when a visitor from another country respects the indigenous population, its culture, morality and traditions, and the host society shows equal respect and hospitality. An immigrant can switch their category “guest” to the status of a citizen of the country by a court decision and only if the basic cultural and moral values ​​of the society into which the visitor integrates are fully accepted.

    Free competition and cooperation of cultures and economies of different countries is what we call “progress”. In the conditions of a monoculture and a mono-economic system, as the sad experience of the USSR has shown, progress freezes, the economy and culture begin to degrade. And as in any competition, there are economies that are more adequate to reality and less, more efficient and less. All people are very different, all cultures are very different, because the effectiveness of economies based on different cultures is different. Those that are more effective are more valuable to the whole world than others, for they show others “how to,” while others show, rather, “how not.” And “as it should” is more valuable to all of humanity, because it provides an example to follow, and, therefore, to strengthen competition and accelerate progress.

    Conclusion

    Thus, the basis of the approach of the New World to the structure of the state is based on scientific and engineering approaches to the method of forming the branches of government, their reporting to the citizens of the country, the structure of society, as well as culture and the economy. This is not surprising, since it is engineers and scientists who become the very “human capital” exploited by the class, in the creation and development of which they will invest according to the principle of maximizing the produced surplus value. At the same time, the upper class of the social class of engineers and scientists becomes a new exploiting class. And since engineers and scientists are extremely focused on the current reality, which, in fact, is the subject of study of these people, the ideology of the New World, honest, scientifically-oriented and realistic, I called “realism” from the abbreviation “realistic idealism”. Time, when society was immersed in the ephemeral tales of “liberalism”, “communism”, “socialism”, “communitarianism”, it passed. Within the framework of these tales, only the intelligentsia continues to live, since they have long been divorced from reality, but, fortunately, its role in society is rapidly decreasing after the dying "middle class" of the old formation, of which, in fact, is a part. What is “good” and what is “bad” used to be defined by worshipers, populists, politicians and writers, now these things are more and more determined by research on the part of applied sciences and practical scientists. The only "-ism" of the 19th-20th centuries that has shown its least minimal viability is nationalism, since it is an integral part of "realism." Yes, the building of the institutions of "realism" is not so beautiful,

    Also popular now: