# "Antifraud 2.0": How Hosting Providers Are Becoming Regulators of VPN Traffic
Amendments to the "Antifraud 2.0" bill, currently in its second reading in the State Duma, impose direct obligations on hosting providers to block clients using VPNs to access prohibited content. This shifts their role from neutral technical intermediaries to active enforcers in the control system, introducing new risks for IT infrastructure and international projects.
Obligations of Hosting Providers: From Intermediary to Regulator
Hosting providers offering VPS, virtual machines, and disk space have until now acted as neutral technical intermediaries. Their liability was limited to complying with Roskomnadzor directives after receiving violation notices. The new amendments fundamentally change this paradigm: hosting operators must independently screen clients against RKN blacklists and block access upon detecting provision of access to prohibited resources.
Key changes include:
- Mandatory verification of clients' IP addresses against Roskomnadzor registries
- Requirement for ongoing traffic monitoring for signs of block circumvention
- Automatic contract termination upon violation detection, without prior notice
These measures will force hosters to deploy deep packet inspection (DPI) systems and integrate with government registries. Most Russian providers lack the required tech capabilities, driving up operating costs. Experts estimate basic VPS pricing could rise 20-35% by 2026.
Technical Implementation of Control: Limitations and Vulnerabilities
Methodological guidelines distributed to businesses in April 2026 outline a three-stage VPN activity detection system:
- IP Address Analysis: Cross-check against Russian IP databases and RKN blacklists. Mismatched country or presence in violator registries triggers the next stage.
- Mobile Devices: Scan installed apps for VPN clients. The Ministry of Digital Development notes the technical impossibility of full iOS monitoring due to app sandboxing.
- Desktop Systems: Analyze network connections, noting that router, virtual machine, or split-tunneling traffic remains undetectable.
The system's critical flaw is its high false positive rate. Internal Ministry of Digital Development documents confirm it's technically impossible to distinguish corporate VPNs (e.g., for internal CRM access) from block-bypassing tools. Services like Sber and Ozon already mass-block users from Belarus and Kazakhstan over non-localized IPs. Regulators warn that prolonged monitoring is economically impractical due to heavy client-side resource demands.
Economic Filter: Narrowing International Channels
Alongside "Antifraud 2.0" amendments, telecom operators signed a moratorium on expanding international links without Ministry of Digital Development approval. RBC reports ~20 companies (including MTS and Beeline) have paused new Europe routes. Regulators frame this as an "economic filter"—artificially capping bandwidth to curb foreign content demand.
The approach rests on two assumptions:
- Overloading existing channels will make VPNs uneconomical
- Hiking international traffic costs (post-15 GB cap) will cut usage
Technical analysis reveals a 30-40% bandwidth cut won't curb VPN traffic but will degrade legit international services. Hybrid cloud-reliant SaaS firms and developers depending on foreign repositories will suffer most. No moratorium end date breeds long-term IT business uncertainty.
Consequences for IT Infrastructure and Developers
Amendments' fallout extends beyond VPN providers. Corporate setups using VPNs for secure internal access (remote work, foreign partner integration) face major hurdles. Hosting providers must block "suspicious" connections but lack tunnel legitimacy checks, risking:
- Automatic shutdowns of production servers from false alarms
- IT accreditation loss for incomplete "illegal" traffic blocking
- Flight of global-facing startups from Russia
Geodistributed projects are especially vulnerable: RF-EU cloud services, international marketplaces, cross-border fintech. They must juggle Russian and EU rules (GDPR), rendering new compliance impossible without full architecture overhauls.
Key Takeaways
- Hosting providers lose neutrality: Dragged into regulatory enforcement without tools for accurate violation ID
- Economic filter endangers legit projects: Channel squeezes hit VPNs and global-infrastructure-dependent corporate systems alike
- Operating cost surge: DPI rollout and registry integration to boost hosting prices 20-35%
- Data leak risks: Unverified auto-blocks could cripple critical systems (financial txns, healthcare)
The system's tech limits render it useless against determined block evasion but erect huge hurdles for lawful business. International operators should reassess infrastructure now amid rising regulatory pressures.
— Editorial Team
No comments yet.