August 11, 2010 at 18:54How to make presentations
Yesterday we had an exit conference.
Heads of departments talked about the results of the last six months and about plans that were close and not very good.
The low technical quality of the presentations was striking in its mass. Not speeches, but precisely what is being demonstrated on the screen. The three most important disadvantages:
this presentation about presentations from Alexei Kapterev. In order not to repeat myself, on the whole there is everything that I wanted to say to me here. Well, unless you add that it is extremely important not to make mistakes in the headers. And in the presentations, the headlines are everything!
For those who have more time, I recommend Belov's articles (parts one and two ). An article from our Habra is also very useful, 5 proven ways to make the audience feel like idiots , it shows with examples how to not do it.
Heads of departments talked about the results of the last six months and about plans that were close and not very good.
The low technical quality of the presentations was striking in its mass. Not speeches, but precisely what is being demonstrated on the screen. The three most important disadvantages:
- very shallow
- a lot of letters
- there are many spelling and punctuation errors and they are rude.
this presentation about presentations from Alexei Kapterev. In order not to repeat myself, on the whole there is everything that I wanted to say to me here. Well, unless you add that it is extremely important not to make mistakes in the headers. And in the presentations, the headlines are everything!
For those who have more time, I recommend Belov's articles (parts one and two ). An article from our Habra is also very useful, 5 proven ways to make the audience feel like idiots , it shows with examples how to not do it.