February 20, 2009 at 16:48Downloaded from torrent - robbed the author
This is a kind of answer to this very interesting post .
So, let's start from the beginning - with the production of cinema, which the author offers us not to be ashamed to steal: Participate
in the filming: director, actors, staff and ... sponsor.
Sponsor - one who is able to give 100-300 million dollars needed for filming. The sponsor's goal is to make money.
Yes Yes! Sponsor - greedy, mercantile and nasty. The sponsor does not give a damn about noble motives, the influence of cinema, etc. Sponsor wants money.
Now the problem is that without a sponsor there will be no movie. At all. Maximum - home shooting on which people will not be able to spend a lot of time, because they will need to work somewhere else. There will be no actors with a masterful game, since it will be more profitable for them to use their gift as sellers. Talented directors will shoot commercials for TV.
Sponsor gives money. Films are filmed. The criterion by which they judge who to give money the next time to shoot a new masterpiece is ... right, payback.
So, you, who downloaded the movie from torrents, motivating it with the fact that Sony, Varner, ... do not have the rights to the movie, deprived the director of the opportunity to create the next masterpiece.
Didn't the movie pay off? Why? Because someone uploaded the version to torrents a week before the release?
Yes, the label does not care that this is a mega-masterpiece. The label was compromised by several tens of millions of dollars. If the director receives money the next time, then 2-3 times less. Naturally he hates you. An actor who hasn't got the role hates you.
You simply stole the work. Do not be surprised that the next time the label will not give you a DVD. Only media with extra protection. Which, of course, will only work in Windows X. You, yelling about the fact that the ugly DVD does not play in your favorite Linux / makosi, have achieved this yourself.
In fact, even many authors of interesting sites hate cutting banner programs - using them you deprive the author of his source of livelihood, forcing him to go and clean the toilets instead of creating interesting sites.
So, let's start from the beginning - with the production of cinema, which the author offers us not to be ashamed to steal: Participate
in the filming: director, actors, staff and ... sponsor.
Sponsor - one who is able to give 100-300 million dollars needed for filming. The sponsor's goal is to make money.
Yes Yes! Sponsor - greedy, mercantile and nasty. The sponsor does not give a damn about noble motives, the influence of cinema, etc. Sponsor wants money.
Now the problem is that without a sponsor there will be no movie. At all. Maximum - home shooting on which people will not be able to spend a lot of time, because they will need to work somewhere else. There will be no actors with a masterful game, since it will be more profitable for them to use their gift as sellers. Talented directors will shoot commercials for TV.
Sponsor gives money. Films are filmed. The criterion by which they judge who to give money the next time to shoot a new masterpiece is ... right, payback.
So, you, who downloaded the movie from torrents, motivating it with the fact that Sony, Varner, ... do not have the rights to the movie, deprived the director of the opportunity to create the next masterpiece.
Didn't the movie pay off? Why? Because someone uploaded the version to torrents a week before the release?
Yes, the label does not care that this is a mega-masterpiece. The label was compromised by several tens of millions of dollars. If the director receives money the next time, then 2-3 times less. Naturally he hates you. An actor who hasn't got the role hates you.
You simply stole the work. Do not be surprised that the next time the label will not give you a DVD. Only media with extra protection. Which, of course, will only work in Windows X. You, yelling about the fact that the ugly DVD does not play in your favorite Linux / makosi, have achieved this yourself.
In fact, even many authors of interesting sites hate cutting banner programs - using them you deprive the author of his source of livelihood, forcing him to go and clean the toilets instead of creating interesting sites.