March 19, 2008 at 22:02Thoughts on 2.0 + bonus (continuation of countries, regions, cities)
Hello everyone, habralyudi. About 4 years ago I made the “new” NoNaMe, the same nnm.ru, which has been giving fry for more than 7 years. At that time, there were no 2.0 concepts, but we really did a 2.0 project, taking as a basis that there were + groups from Yahoo + a bunch of our ideas, we implemented a 2.0 idea before others described it. But at that moment we did not know that it would eventually be called web 2.0, that they say the content was generated by the users themselves, etc. The current NNM is little like modern 2.0 solutions, however, whether you like it or not, it really was a pioneer. Today I would like to talk not about a specific project, but about 2.0 as a whole. It has been a long time since when people from empty words "web 2.0" came to a clear understanding of what it is and who it is. 2.0 often screwed to such words as ajax, rss, usability, social, etc. In fact, there is no clear definition of 2.0, but for me personally this is another step towards independence. Those. there are some technologies that we use (at first it was html, then css and js appeared, then flash, xml, ajax, etc.), and there is an approach to building services / projects / sites, call it what you want. About 10 years ago, I could not imagine that you can make your own service such as mail.ru, and now? Now every second can create something like that. 2.0 solutions are, for me personally, a bunch of modern technologies and modern trends, fashion, so to speak. Namely - social, content generation by users, etc. Technology and concepts should be distinguished. About 10 years ago, I could not imagine that you can make your own service such as mail.ru, and now? Now every second can create something like that. 2.0 solutions are, for me personally, a bunch of modern technologies and modern trends, fashion, so to speak. Namely - social, content generation by users, etc. Technology and concepts should be distinguished. About 10 years ago, I could not imagine that you can make your own service such as mail.ru, and now? Now every second can create something like that. 2.0 solutions are, for me personally, a bunch of modern technologies and modern trends, fashion, so to speak. Namely - social, content generation by users, etc. Technology and concepts should be distinguished.
2.0 solutions in the form of concepts have a number of pluses and minuses, like any on our planet. In particular, I would like to draw a parallel with ... the radio ...
Modern radio does not seem to be without a "program by request", where the music is put through, without SMS voting and other modern services. But there is an exception ...
Namely - KEKS FM. Residents of the hemorrhoid city of Moscow probably noticed the numerous advertisements of this radio station in the metro, on billboards and other advertising platforms of the city. Once, I bought a regular billboard and tuned the receiver in my car to 89.9, expecting to hear another banal radio station and with a calm soul switch to another and calm down. It was not there. Not only do they practically do nothing about music and news, they also do not receive calls or SMS with orders. Their motto is: “Keks.fm, play what we want!”. Brilliant and paradoxical. As a radio, a striking example of 1.0 can be born in the times of 2.0 decisions of radio stations and is proud of it! Moreover, now I listen to him constantly. And I'm not alone! A vivid example of the fact that with a good bad luck, even old, forgotten decisions can give 10 points handicap the most modern solutions.
2.0 solutions in the form of concepts have a number of pluses and minuses, like any on our planet. In particular, I would like to draw a parallel with ... the radio ...
Modern radio does not seem to be without a "program by request", where the music is put through, without SMS voting and other modern services. But there is an exception ...
Namely - KEKS FM. Residents of the hemorrhoid city of Moscow probably noticed the numerous advertisements of this radio station in the metro, on billboards and other advertising platforms of the city. Once, I bought a regular billboard and tuned the receiver in my car to 89.9, expecting to hear another banal radio station and with a calm soul switch to another and calm down. It was not there. Not only do they practically do nothing about music and news, they also do not receive calls or SMS with orders. Their motto is: “Keks.fm, play what we want!”. Brilliant and paradoxical. As a radio, a striking example of 1.0 can be born in the times of 2.0 decisions of radio stations and is proud of it! Moreover, now I listen to him constantly. And I'm not alone! A vivid example of the fact that with a good bad luck, even old, forgotten decisions can give 10 points handicap the most modern solutions.