Neocommunism. Theoretical background
Existing capitalism is not an optimal form of social structure. Let's talk about neocommunism.
Hello. My name is Sergey Matveev. It seems to me that I'm not quite adequate. The fact is that I want to change the world.
It all started with the fact that in childhood I considered myself a very stupid child (partly, of course, reasonably), despite the fact that I studied at school pretty well and ended up with a silver medal, but I was always ashamed of it because believed that he received it undeservedly.
Yes, I really spent almost all my time studying, except for the time when I was just physically unable to use my resources (well, of course, too lazy), but mastering the operation of the transistor, which I combined with studying the operation of electronic lamps, mastering derivatives, it took me years. Really years. Of course, I'm not talking about the fact that every day I sat on different books in which it was possible to study a specific problem from different angles. I studied the problems with just one first book that came across and tried to conduct many thought experiments, for which I simply did not have enough intelligence. I very keenly felt his lack. And when my eyes turned to the world that surrounds me, to how people behave, to how they plan and realize their life, how states function, everything what was going on around me, I was sure that I didn’t understand why everything was happening this way for one reason - I’m too stupid to understand this. But time passed. I entered the institute and began to notice that very often what I used to think was too complicated due to its genius of events turned out to be simply the result of someone unbearable stupidity. And when I began to become more and more convinced in my perception that people who make important decisions simply do not deserve to be in their places, then everything began to fall into place. I realized that there are too many idiots. Moreover, idiocy is a very real highly virulent disease that people easily contract with. I entered the institute and began to notice that very often what I used to think was too complicated due to its genius of events turned out to be simply the result of someone unbearable stupidity. And when I began to become more and more convinced in my perception that people who make important decisions simply do not deserve to be in their places, then everything began to fall into place. I realized that there are too many idiots. Moreover, idiocy is a very real highly virulent disease that people easily contract with. I entered the institute and began to notice that very often what I used to think was too complicated due to its genius of events turned out to be simply the result of someone unbearable stupidity. And when I began to become more and more convinced in my perception that people who make important decisions simply do not deserve to be in their places, then everything began to fall into place. I realized that there are too many idiots. Moreover, idiocy is a very real highly virulent disease that people easily contract with. just do not deserve to be in their places, then everything began to fall into place. I realized that there are too many idiots. Moreover, idiocy is a very real highly virulent disease that people easily contract with. just do not deserve to be in their places, then everything began to fall into place. I realized that there are too many idiots. Moreover, idiocy is a very real highly virulent disease that people easily contract with.
Awareness of this led me into a wild depression. The more I understood, the less I wanted to live in this world. I just became aware that I, by definition, cannot be happy in him. It has too much dirt, too much aggression, too much lies and too much cruelty, and all this is ensured by general stupidity, which skillfully mimics rationality. Together with personal problems, this led me to thoughts of suicide, from which I made, it seems to me, a very reasonable conclusion: “Yes, I am ready to die, but not rushing out of the window, or in some other idiotic way. I want to die from overload as a result of trying to change this world. " I believe that this is the ideal formula for suicide, because if I die, I will not lose anything, but on the contrary, I will acquire those fabulous moments that are found in the life of anyone, even the most unlucky person. Well, and besides, there is always a small chance that I will succeed in changing this world, and I will become a truly happy person! And I began my suicide by abandoning a formal education (institute), which by that time had completely ceased to be respected, and went to serve in the GRU special forces, from where I couldn’t escape from my weakness - they simply won’t let me do it ... It was not easy, but it was there that I got what I lacked the most — strength that I never had, and I always missed.
I have been a positive person since childhood. Almost did not participate in fights. I was not just afraid of fighting, I was afraid of conflict. It always seemed to me that conflict is a thing that is absolutely superfluous in human relations. Well, really, why conflict, if you can calmly discuss the problem and, having made concessions to each other, solve it.
Of course, I was a naive idiot, but why was ... I still think so, but with one caveat - there are those people with whom this works (and there are very few), but there are those with whom conflict is the only possible solution . This is what I best realized in the army. And it was there that the idea came that some people need to be isolated from each other. Isolate not on religious grounds, not on gender, not on nationality. Isolate from each other by psychotype, and only in this case the rational and the wise will become even better, and the dumb ... and nothing terrible will happen to the dumb.
In fact, the idea of something similar I had before the army. In my head was a project that I called Atlantis 7. Which was supposed to represent an Internet portal where the most talented could exchange experiences, tell which sources of information are the most digestible and truthful, educate each other, and just meet, communicate, love each other.
This project, of course, by definition did not include stupid people. He simply ignored them, and this, as I now think, is a significant mistake. First of all, because smart people always come from stupid people. Well, stupid people can not be ignored, because they are everywhere. You may come across a stupid doctor who will cripple you with his treatment or kill you. A dumb driver who thinks that you can ride red if you are in a hurry and knock someone close. And the worst thing is that these are not just pessimistic calculations, but facts. Today, tomorrow and the day after tomorrow there will be victims of stupidity. In general, I consider stupidity the worst human disease, from which more people died than from any other, including old age, because the root cause of most diseases, disasters, wars is human stupidity,
Here I would like to note that stupidity is an aggressive form of stupidity, and stupidity is inherent in every person. Every person in his life has done stupid things and therefore every person has the right to be stupid. Then how to separate stupid from stupid? Yes, it’s very simple: a stupid person realizes his stupidity and is ready to confide in the solution of complex problems, the solution of which he does not know, to more experienced and intelligent people, while a dumb person will always consider himself better and smarter than everyone else. A smart one will always consider himself stupid, because he understands how complex and diverse the world is and never can reach perfection and will always listen to someone else’s opinion, even if it’s the opinion of a stupid person, because even the most stupid one can say something very reasonable, and sometimes something stupid, but that makes sense, which can serve as a starting point for a rational idea. In fact, this separation is not of practical importance, but only purely theoretical. It is important to understand only one thing - it is necessary that stupid people do not suffer from the isolation of stupid people.
Thus, if we want to build an ideal society, then the first thing to do is to raise the banner “Reasonable people, unite!”
This is the basic part of the neocommunism formula, but a cry alone will not be enough. Here it is worth moving on to the very name - neocommunism. I use it precisely because in history there has already been a relatively successful experiment to create an ideal society. An experiment on us. And it so happened that, being born in the USSR, I captured a small island of communism (more precisely, socialism), which slowly faded away in the rays of capitalism. In my favorite urban-type village, I came across only its positive aspects, namely:
1) comfort. Yes, this is probably the most important thing that I felt there. Homeliness of a village arranged for itself, in which there were always freshly painted flowerbeds, arranged fences, enclosing gardens with flowers, a fountain, a club, on the paved area in front of which, various holidays were held ... - fading traces of the once prosperous Soviet mining village. A couple of Sovdep shops where you could buy the most delicious bread I have ever eaten, the most delicious eclairs and the most real ice cream - products, after which are “ordinary” for me, “capitalist”, so to speak, store things were perceived as something primerious or salted, with a taste of some chemistry. Yes, indeed, the choice of products was extremely scarce, but they were really high-quality, fresh products,
2) people. I am always amazed at the expression "man of Soviet hardening." How accurate is this definition. In my mind, people from the Soviet past are people from red-hot steel. And I always felt this according to their words, which they never threw into the wind and, of course, according to their actions. For me, the symbols of Soviet people will always be those sculptures of the Soviet era in which they were simply carved from stone, or forged from steel with these remnants of angularity or scale. What a magical feeling this is, when you understand that you can rely on a person without a bit of doubt in him, when it doesn’t even come to your mind that someone or your relatives can offend you, because you see people around you, which are warm in the eyes. Warm and simply indestructible strength obtained as a result of hard work. I didn’t understand then
I would like to revive all the best that was in the Soviet Union, and there was a lot of the best:
1) a culture that nurtured spirit, mutual assistance, ingenuity, in which there was no hatred and anger, there was no fear;
2) science, which to this day, in my opinion, is the standard. Those who read Soviet textbooks, I am sure, immediately fall in love with the presentation of the material, which, as a rule, is chewed very well and it is always clear that the book was written by a real expert in this matter. An expert who at the same time understands that he explains the material to a beginner and therefore uses simple speech, chewing complex words;
3) standards that have enveloped all areas of production activity. Including due to the standards, high quality of all products was ensured;
4) ideology, which for some reason is usually blamed. Yes, I do not approve of the glorification of the leader, I do not approve of too strict censorship, but according to the remnants of culture that have come down to us, the ideology was primarily to educate worthy citizens who could not only peacefully but coexist, work hard and work together and get pleasure from their work. I am sure that a person is not able to live in the absence of ideology - where the absence of ideology is declared, in fact it is, it is simply not centralized and is formed under the influence of the most informational and influential circles, which, as a rule, large companies become. In the absence of ideology, in fact, information excerpts from advertisements, films, videos, and radio broadcasts become the reference point to which a person (mainly children) will pay attention,
For a very long time I have been interested in the question: “How did the Soviet Union turn into Russia of the 90s?” There are various conspiracy theories which, it seems to me, have the right to life, there are economic justifications, but for me personally this does not matter. I want to understand how Soviet people, among whom it was cruel, were punished not by thieves, but even by those harmless by today's standards, as unemployed, under the article for parasitism (even Viktor Tsoi had to work as a fireman), people who were always very sympathetic , turned into those who do not care about everyone except themselves. And in my thoughts and observations I came to the following opinion: “The ideology of capitalism, or rather, the lack of its own ideology, was to blame.”
Honestly, since childhood, I believed that capitalism is an ideal form of government and that was a very wonderful example - the USA, ideal in every sense. A high standard of living for all segments of the population, people are happy with their lives and the rest of the world envies them. I was also envious and wanted to go there to live, when it was clear to me that Russia was a country of victorious corruption, criminals, drunkards — all this was strongly felt in the 90s. Since childhood, I did not accept that all people can be equated. Talented people should not receive as many benefits as those who do everything through their sleeves, as was the case in the Soviet Union. I was always sure that competition, which ideally should lead to talented people opening their own firms, starting a business, competing with other organizers in their business, should lead to the improvement of the world as a whole. Indeed, according to the logic of capitalism, the most talented, i.e. the one who organizes business for people, i.e. creates the best quality goods, provides the best quality services and all this at the most optimal prices. So it was supposed to be. But it turned out that competition could be quite different. And now it is too clearly seen that this “other” competition is becoming decisive at the present time. What are its basic principles? And now it is too clearly seen that this “other” competition is becoming decisive at the present time. What are its basic principles? And now it is too clearly seen that this “other” competition is becoming decisive at the present time. What are its basic principles?
The competition may be different. In sports, the competition is that the most prepared wins. That is how it should be. But there are those who are beginning to cheat - doping, various tricks to lower the morale of the opponent, etc. So now I see capitalism. Every year, “life hackers” begin to play an increasing role in the world, finding holes in the not-so-slender idea of capitalism, that is, those people who clearly noticed that in order to defeat a competitor it is not necessary to be better than him. Quite the contrary - you need to be mercantile, insidious and preferably a killer. The need for commercialism and deceit is manifested in the fact that if you use the cheapest components and technologies in production, and present it as some kind of innovation, and at the same time clog the information channels with false advertising, then you can get significantly more benefits than if you do everything honestly, because at the same time everything will be according to the law. I mentioned that you need to be a killer, not only and not so much because you can squeeze business from others in this way, but because sometimes for the business the most optimal in terms of profit is indirect destruction of people. The growth of tobacco and alcohol companies, the artificially high prices for medicines, the promotion of antisocial behavior, to promote certain goods, services, "works of art" - all this is clearly visible now. The most interesting thing is that world society itself has not changed much in terms of understanding life ideals and values, but it is increasingly beginning to consume what contradicts them for one very good reason - a lie. Lying has become the most important tool for promoting a business, as for policy promotion. The main reason for this course of affairs is the lack of control over the lies on the part of the state, as it was in the Soviet Union, and the absence of any significant mechanisms of control on the part of society. Those. of course, some control tools are still available, but they are scattered and do not stop the lie, which in turn becomes more difficult to recognize and, most importantly, it becomes more difficult to convict of it, because mechanisms of lies are being improved. which in turn is becoming increasingly difficult to recognize and, most importantly, it is becoming more difficult to convict in it, because mechanisms of lies are being improved. which in turn is becoming increasingly difficult to recognize and, most importantly, it is becoming more difficult to convict in it, because mechanisms of lies are being improved.
The most actively used are such methods of masking lies as:
1) understatement, i.e. the logical chain of truthful informational messages leads to a false conclusion, although this conclusion itself is absent in the message, which means that there is no formal excuse for the proceedings. In this case, the message contains only those truthful messages that give it the necessary semantic coloring, while contradictory truthful messages are silent;
2) erosion of meaning, i.e. the message chain has a double meaning - the obvious meaning necessary for the audience, which is the main goal of the chain and not obvious, which is necessary for formal justification;
3) attracting reputable people to promote goods and services. This becomes possible, because in most cases only the size of the reward is important for the relevant authority involved. The credibility in the information message, of course, clearly never indicates the shortcomings of what it advertises, as a result of which these shortcomings seem insignificant or even absent.
The richest companies in the existing conditions are those who lie better than everyone, i.e. those who can sell cheap goods or services for expensive, paying as little as possible to their employees and the state. Obviously, it is hardly worth relying on the fact that such companies will contribute to the prosperity of the world, although they, of course, will declare it. Such companies will always absorb competitors and destroy them, especially those who point to lies. Those who reveal the lie automatically become the enemies of the most influential, which means they will be destroyed, and the most effective and reliable way to destroy those who notice the lie is numbness. Thus, human dullness is not only an easily spreading difficult to cure disease, but also greenhouse conditions are created intentionally for it, because it is food for the further growth of capitalism. I am deeply convinced that the growth of such capitalism will lead to the collapse of society as a result of wars. And I’m not even talking about a global war, the likelihood of which will only grow, but I’m talking about the fundamental desire for fierce competition, in which everyone will try to tear the tidbit directly from the teeth of a competitor. I am sure this road will lead to the inhumanization of the whole world. Of course, this road is very long, but this does not change the fact that the end will still be and I think that it will be something like in “Universe 25”. and I'm talking about the fundamental desire for fierce competition, in which everyone will try to tear the tidbit directly from the teeth of a competitor. I am sure this road will lead to the inhumanization of the whole world. Of course, this road is very long, but this does not change the fact that the end will still be and I think that it will be something like in “Universe 25”. and I'm talking about the fundamental desire for fierce competition, in which everyone will try to tear the tidbit directly from the teeth of a competitor. I am sure this road will lead to the inhumanization of the whole world. Of course, this road is very long, but this does not change the fact that the end will still be and I think that it will be something like in “Universe 25”.
The way out of this aggravating situation I see is building a society of the most educated and wise people of mankind and transferring to it all the resources of the planet (or by that time the planets) (I would like to recall that the idea is not new - it is already being used in the framework of the “Venus Project” but he is engaged in the design of an appropriate future, while I propose moving immediately to action), but the problem is where to find this society and who will voluntarily agree to transfer resources to it ... As for the first question, for me about vet is obvious - bring up. Yes, we can educate those who can build a harmonious, well-balanced world, but I mean not only and not so much raise our children, but rather educate ourselves, because the highest qualities, namely honesty, honesty, perseverance, Kindness cannot be imposed, nor can it be (or at least quite difficult) to instill in a person the motivation to participate in this. If a person is kind, then this is solely the result of his own choice, and not a combination of circumstances, but at the same time, of course, you should not miss the influence of circumstances on this fact.
How is it possible to educate yourself so as to become the leader of something big and bright? And how can you create a society that will consist entirely of such worthy people? I voiced the answer at the very beginning - to unite. Unite under the auspices of personal growth, self-improvement. But here we come to the problem of what we live in the real world, where we want to eat, live somewhere, help our loved ones, and if we are lucky, we also enjoy life. It turns out that it is necessary to add functionality to this society to make money - the universally recognized equivalent of our earthly goods. But perhaps this contradicts the original goal - self-development? No, just the opposite. Just imagine what kind of things a crowd of intellectuals can do, provided they read a fable about a swan, a crab and a pike. Even a few smart people, United by a common plan, I am sure, can turn mountains. All that is needed for this is to provide them with the exchange of information and the creation of such jobs in which they can work effectively and multiply each other's achievements. And in addition to making money, it will also be the easiest and most reliable way to self-development, of course, if this making money will be associated with intellectual or artistic activity.
How to provide a good job in the existing world? Yes, nothing is simpler, you just need to provide a software environment in which they can exchange ideas, and it’s better to do their work directly, for example, at the same time, seeing each other’s results, designing a new robot, or writing a new musical composition together, or writing a script together to a new film, or to create a cartoon together. Thus, the most important thing that such a society needs is programmers who will ensure the work of the society, as well as create other works of technical creativity for society and the rest of the world. It is the caste of programmers that must be the very first and most privileged. Yes, it is privileged, because I have already said that I am against equalization of rights. Each member of society should make a profit and have some social status according to the principles of meritocracy, i.e. in accordance with the invested work, and more importantly, in accordance with the invested contribution, which may include, among other things, the proposal of some brilliant idea. How will such a design differ from a regular company? Firstly, people will be consolidated around the idea that interests them the most, and secondly, they will be matched to each other in accordance with the psychotype and the achievements available at that time. The most popular, respectively, will be those who have the most achievements, and accordingly will have (should have) the most privileges and the greatest remuneration for their work, the greatest fame. Moreover, the division into psychotypes will contribute to that for those types of activities those who are best at this activity will be suitable. In this sense, the most obvious division, it seems to me, will be the division of people into those who generate ideas and performers, because these are fundamentally different types of activities and usually one who generates ideas well can rarely do something, just like and someone who is well versed in any technology can rarely come up with something original, although in both cases, of course, there are exceptions, but such a separation, as I see it, will be very effective. Of course, there should be a fundamental division into types of activities, but it is much more important to distinguish a manager, i.e. the one who will follow the design of the task, divide it into subtasks and make the final decision. The fact, that disagreements often arise in collective tasks. Disagreements can be resolved by voting among the working group, voting among the entire community (or a community group selected by any criterion), or when all studies appear controversial, they must be resolved by the manager. I would also like to point out that I see a huge role behind the open source, i.e. I believe that, ideally, the result of labor should be a product with fully open source code (including for closed commercial use) - this will allow each subsequent group to enjoy the fruits of the previous work. And I mean not only programs. For example, it would be a good idea to create an electric car with open documentation and the corresponding opportunity to improve the model and, of course, the ability to print an electric car on a 3D printer and to independently produce its elements on machines in “home conditions”. The same people in virtual professions will also have to develop conveyor systems for the automatic assembly of real objects, so far at the project level, for their implementation in the future, so that neocommunism can move on to the next stage - the industrial one.
Thus, the first step in building neocommunism should be the creation of an environment in which people will improve themselves and create something in a virtual environment, i.e. the main role at the first stage belongs to programmers, designers, musicians, artists and other representatives of professions that fully fit into the virtual world.
The second stage should be the redemption (rental) of premises where one could gather for meetings and discussions of various tasks, as well as just for a good time, preferably with the opportunity to spend the night there, eat, relax, i.e. places where people would feel as comfortable as possible - this will significantly strengthen the relationship between people, create opportunities for work of labor collectives.
The third stage should be the repurchase of production facilities, where it would be possible to place 3D printers, machine tools, robots and other production equipment with maximum automation capabilities, capable of producing the widest possible range of real objects. First of all, it is necessary to produce production equipment at such production facilities, because, as expected, it will be greatly missed by the growing number of interested users of the system.
Depending on the number of users of the system, it may be possible to create its own political force, which will promote the interests of the community within the state (or even states). So for example, lobbying for laws allowing the use of homemade electric cars may be required. In addition, such a political force will be able to bring order to the political system of the state and smoothly merge with the state apparatus.
With the growth of well-being of users of the system, they will have the opportunity to help other people, including those who are not in the system. First of all, in my opinion, it should be about helping children, and I’m talking not only about orphans, but also about those children who are actually abandoned (or even intimidated as a result of domestic violence) by their parents - such situations too much is happening now - the increased demand for suicide, alcoholism, and smoking among children is a clear evidence of this. Help for children (and not only for children, but in general for people in difficult life situations, but primarily for children) should be carried out according to a "detective" mechanism, i.e. it is necessary to implement a search mechanism for such children by scanning social networks, using cries to which people will respond not necessarily with help, and even just the information that they know who needs help. The community will help in such difficult situations either by patronage or by involving the police and social services in the problem. As for orphans, then I consider it acceptable and even necessary to embed advertising in the system of children. I don’t know how it can be called differently, but the point is to inform society as fully as possible about children who need help, or rather parents. Here, the selection of children for guardianship by psychotype should also play a positive role, in order to provide children and their new parents with the most comfortable conditions. Mutual assistance should play a special role with regard to women. The fact is that I do not just support feminism, but I believe that women should have many more rights than men. Women are what which makes the main point, so their problems need to be addressed first. They should have a more unloaded work schedule and a more loaded schedule of rest with interesting, exciting events, and not as they say "this is it." I'm not talking about violence against women. In my opinion, it is the psychological state of women that is the main litmus test that determines the health of society.
As I have already said, violence and cruelty are now very powerful. You can run into crime anywhere, and besides, as I think, he will try to integrate himself into the system, therefore, to protect the interests of each participant in the system, I suggest creating a security service whose role will be completely civilian, namely getting into difficult conflict situations and their legal decision. I, as a person who once worked in the economic security service of a very large bank, I can say, having worked with the police, that very often, it needs to be forced into legal actions, and there are appropriate mechanisms for this. Also very often a person needs not the police, but just support. Unfortunately, now domestic violence is becoming the scourge of our society and to resolve such internal problems, in which the least protected usually suffer, i.e. women and children, constant monitoring of such families is necessary. The police (precinct) and guardianship authorities, unfortunately, are not always able to provide it due to the fact that each time it depends on a particular precinct or other public servant. Also, the security service can engage in socially useful activities, for example, the study of various criminal systems of deceit and even kidnapping, i.e. actually detective work. She should also deal with the destruction of such phenomena as the Blue Whale, which once again emphasizes the deplorable psychological health situation among children, which directly depends on the climate in the family. not always able to provide it due to the fact that each time it depends on a particular district or other civil servant. Also, the security service can engage in socially useful activities, for example, the study of various criminal systems of deceit and even kidnapping, i.e. actually detective work. She should also deal with the destruction of such phenomena as the Blue Whale, which once again emphasizes the deplorable psychological health situation among children, which directly depends on the climate in the family. not always able to provide it due to the fact that each time it depends on a particular district or other civil servant. Also, the security service can engage in socially useful activities, for example, the study of various criminal systems of deceit and even kidnapping, i.e. actually detective work. She should also deal with the destruction of such phenomena as the Blue Whale, which once again emphasizes the deplorable psychological health situation among children, which directly depends on the climate in the family. actually detective work. She should also deal with the destruction of such phenomena as the Blue Whale, which once again emphasizes the deplorable psychological health situation among children, which directly depends on the climate in the family. actually detective work. She should also deal with the destruction of such phenomena as the Blue Whale, which once again emphasizes the deplorable psychological health situation among children, which directly depends on the climate in the family.
As can be seen from the description that I proposed, neocommunism is a hybrid of capitalism and communism, therefore it can also be called neocapitalism, i.e. capitalism in which holes are patched. It is completely built on the platform of capitalism, i.e. It does not require any revolutions. It does not require that the whole society be part of it. Neocommunism is just a social network, organized by its own rules and having real manifestations in life, in the form of LLC, political forces and production facilities. Those who will not use the system will not lose anything regarding their current situation, while those who will use it will simply gain additional opportunities. This form is convenient because it allows you to exclude the user from the system for his inhuman behavior (murder, violence, theft). A person excluded from the system will only lose additional opportunities, but at the same time will be able to use the publicly available (informational) part of the system, but will not be able to take part in it. An important point here is the yoke problem. By law, a person who has served his term in prison is considered to have atoned for his guilt, and personally I do not deny this. However, I believe that information on a person’s criminal record should be publicly available (article, circumstances of the case, which sometimes change the attitude even towards a murderer, for example, a murdered rapist of his child). So a person who has served time for pedophilia (or has recovered in a psychiatric hospital) should be “on a pencil”, i.e. he should not be allowed to even get close to the children, despite the fact that the law allows this, like people who have been in prison should not fall into power.
In the minds of most people, it is clearly fixed that a sect is a community created with the goal of washing the brain, taking apartments, and generally destroying the individual. And this is not surprising - there are so many examples, but why do people even go to sects? Did they all want to part with real estate, lose their identity? Not. And we come to sugar, which lures people into sects, and sugar is a feeling of collectivity, mutual support, even if fake. But what if you create a "sect" in which there are no attempts to take money, there is no brainwashing with mythical ideas. What if you create a community in which there will simply be people who are willing to support each other? I am sure that such a community cannot exist without an ideology that will draw in new "adherents." But what if this ideology is the most common, classical morality, and the quality of the reference books will be all world literature with a classical interpretation of morality? Indeed, it will be an ideal “sect” in which, on the one hand, there will be meetings with mutual psychological support, communication, joint work and rest, and on the other, it will not have all the negative sides for which sects do not like it. So we come to the generally accessible social manifestation of neocommunism - small or large associations of people in which everyone knows everything about the rest of the members and thus eliminates the likelihood of “random” people who could ruin the aura of mutual assistance and mutual support. communication, joint work and rest, and on the other hand, she will not have all the negative sides for which sects are so disliked. So we come to the generally accessible social manifestation of neocommunism - small or large associations of people in which everyone knows everything about the rest of the members and thus eliminates the likelihood of “random” people who could ruin the aura of mutual assistance and mutual support. communication, joint work and rest, and on the other hand, she will not have all the negative sides for which sects are so disliked. So we come to the generally accessible social manifestation of neocommunism - small or large associations of people in which everyone knows everything about the rest of the members and thus eliminates the likelihood of “random” people who could ruin the aura of mutual assistance and mutual support.
A network that reflects gratitude to users, their achievements and work, their participation in common good deeds, would be an excellent platform for advertising themselves. For what purposes, in order to take a good job, or to run for deputy, or just to find yourself an amazing girl (guy) who (who) will appreciate your talents, it does not matter. It is important that this is an honest way to make yourself known.
If you collect a huge number of people at one point, information from which with a high degree of probability can be considered reliable, this opens up tremendous opportunities for research and experimentation. It would be great if ordinary people could share their successful stories on curing various diseases, and professionals hypothesize the reasons for the cure and conduct relevant studies (including in the framework of professional laboratories). Thus, it would be possible to identify ideal treatment regimens for specific diseases for people with different characteristics, i.e. it is also necessary to identify what the features of the course of the disease can be in different people and how to predict them, put forward tips for the prevention of diseases, which I consider even more significant. I am categorically against the statement that that self-medication is bad. The reason is the same stupidity (and sometimes just not enough education or material interest in promoting a specific medicine or device for treatment or something else), which does not bypass many doctors. At least, I have not come across this many times and came to a simple conclusion: you can figure out any disease, especially when you are vitally interested in this and this interest is likely to make you smarter than your doctor. I would like to give specific examples. I was very sick in childhood and I always wondered why there was no single, effective treatment regimen for the common cold. Yes, it’s clear that everyone has a different organism, but the bacteria are almost all the same. This is me about the fact that if there was an effective and safe bactericidal agent, then it would be possible to quickly treat a cold. At the very least, it would be great if each medicine would have open information about in vitro and in vivo studies, in which it would be clear which bacteria affect the effectiveness of a particular drug. And of course, it is desirable that these studies be carried out on ordinary people who live a real life, and do not sit in sterile boxes, and besides, those who no one paid for these studies, but on the contrary, they paid with their health, and so would be interested in telling the truth. As a result of reflection and a little research, it became clear that there is a small set of universal, relatively safe antiseptics that destroy the widest range of microbes: miramistin, chlorhexidine and hydrogen peroxide. According to the description, chlorhexidine is the most aggressive, for external use only, while miramistin is acceptable for ingestion. I tried miramistin to treat a cold - the effect turned out to be zero and I started looking for information on whether it is permissible to get such a simple and understandable substance as hydrogen peroxide inside the body. What consequences can this lead to. Given its formula, which is very close to the formula of water, I thought it was a fairly safe substance (heavy metals or something poisonous cannot be the reaction products), but with acidic properties. I found information on the Internet that even someone is drinking it. This was enough for me to try to instill a strongly diluted solution (I can be wrong, but I think about 1.0%) in my nose to treat a runny nose (after which, forgive me for blowing my nose for details). And I was very surprised by the effect, - a runny nose passed almost instantly. Of course, I still don’t know how safe it is and whether it can lead to any problems, but as a goal for a multiple experiment among volunteers, I think this experiment would be interesting if the risk was first assessed by professionals.
In addition, I personally am very annoyed by the dominance of generics at inflated prices. It’s one thing if generics are more effective for some reason than a prototype drug, and then it needs experimental research and justification, and it’s quite another thing when they are pushed into the market with aggressive advertising and all kinds of blocking of much cheaper drugs- prototypes (usually this happens automatically from the pharmacy chains, which receive a fixed percentage of sales, which means they are not profitable for cheap drugs). You can also often find a placebo at the price of an elixir of youth, which brings profit to its manufacturer only thanks to false advertising.
Medical paradoxes are also annoying. Sometimes just disgusting in their idiocy. Here I want to recall about the treatment of hepatitis C, which is still often carried out with the help of outdated ultra-expensive drugs with a huge number of harsh side effects, which do not guarantee a complete cure (they are certainly advised by the appropriate doctors), while judging by the forums ( this, of course, also needs confirmation) the highly effective safe medicine Sofosbuvir has been released. Moreover, its generic can be bought in India or China, saving a few hundred thousand rubles (there are much less patent fees for this medicine due to epidemics), but not a single doctor will likely say this. In other words, being treated officially for hepatitis C in Russia is both expensive and life-threatening.
Also, I personally would be interested in what substances and how they affect bacteria, viruses and fungi. And I’m talking not only about medicines, but also about herbs and some household substances: salt, vinegar, juices, Coca-Cola (due to the content of phosphoric acid, I think it can have a similar effect), etc. about physical effects (cold, heat, ultraviolet, infrared light).
Research, of course, may apply to other areas of life. For example, a study of ordinary consumer goods is needed. Now there is a very good universal system for researching goods, Yandex.Market, which does a very good job of this, having on board not only a review system, but also a review output system, as well as discussion of goods. However, I consider this approach to be incomplete, because it does not include information on product improvement, and information on ideal product combinations; moreover, the review system uses a universal assessment, while a separate assessment of individual products would be more accurate qualities of goods. So an example of product improvement is installing Linux instead of Windows on a laptop or tablet, which is not always a trivial task, which professionals could describe in more detail, or indicate that at the moment a full transition to Linux is not possible, due to the lack of some drivers or signed bootloaders. An example of a combination of products is an Arduino module with a specific Blutooth extension, for which you can immediately post a firmware listing. As for voting on the quality of goods, in the voting system on the phone’s camera, one could add a couple (or more) of pictures taken by the corresponding device in the dark and in the light and vote on a photo, or even connect an automatic graphics quality analyzer that estimates which any signs (assessment of the real resolution of the photograph (or vice versa, blur), assessment of colors, etc.). that at the moment, a full transition to Linux is not possible, due to the lack of some drivers or signed bootloaders. An example of a combination of products is an Arduino module with a specific Blutooth extension, for which you can immediately post a firmware listing. As for voting on the quality of goods, in the voting system on the phone’s camera, one could add a couple (or more) of pictures taken by the corresponding device in the dark and in the light and vote on a photo, or even connect an automatic graphics quality analyzer that estimates which any signs (assessment of the real resolution of the photograph (or vice versa, blur), assessment of colors, etc.). that at the moment, a full transition to Linux is not possible, due to the lack of some drivers or signed bootloaders. An example of a combination of products is an Arduino module with a specific Blutooth extension, for which you can immediately post a firmware listing. As for voting on the quality of goods, in the voting system on the phone’s camera, one could add a couple (or more) of pictures taken by the corresponding device in the dark and in the light and vote on a photo, or even connect an automatic graphics quality analyzer that estimates which any signs (assessment of the real resolution of the photograph (or vice versa, blur), assessment of colors, etc.). An example of a combination of products is an Arduino module with a specific Blutooth extension, for which you can immediately post a firmware listing. As for voting on the quality of goods, in the voting system on the phone’s camera, one could add a couple (or more) of pictures taken by the corresponding device in the dark and in the light and vote on a photo, or even connect an automatic graphics quality analyzer that estimates which any signs (assessment of the real resolution of the photograph (or vice versa, blur), assessment of colors, etc.). An example of a combination of products is an Arduino module with a specific Blutooth extension, for which you can immediately post a firmware listing. As for voting on the quality of goods, in the voting system on the phone’s camera, one could add a couple (or more) of pictures taken by the corresponding device in the dark and in the light and vote on a photo, or even connect an automatic graphics quality analyzer that estimates which any signs (assessment of the real resolution of the photograph (or vice versa, blur), assessment of colors, etc.).
At the moment, there is no collective procurement mechanism, which would solve many problems. So, for example, very often farms, producing high-quality goods at a low price, cannot get through to the buyer due to a number of restrictions - on the one hand, their goods are not advertised, or rather, their advertising is crowded out by larger TNCs, on the other, in order to get into retail chains, you need to pay significant money, which is often not affordable for small farms. If you introduce a map of farms and industries on which there would be an assessment of the products of each farm, or even better, the results of inspection of these farms with photographs and videos, as well as information on laboratory studies of goods, as well as provide for the possibility of collective purchase, i.e. funds are raised for the purchase, the packer is hired on them, which will distribute the goods to end customers in accordance with their orders, and of course, payment is made for goods at the factory and payment for delivery. The goods themselves can be picked up at unloading points (equipped or not equipped), or in stores that agree to such cooperation. This approach will allow end customers to receive fresh goods at the lowest price, and a quality producer to find customers for their goods without advertising costs and without intermediaries. Such a mechanism can become a catalyst for the development of high-quality small business, especially in the manufacturing sector. or in stores that agree to such cooperation. This approach will allow end customers to receive fresh goods at the lowest price, and a quality producer to find customers for their goods without advertising costs and without intermediaries. Such a mechanism can become a catalyst for the development of high-quality small business, especially in the manufacturing sector. or in stores that agree to such cooperation. This approach will allow end customers to receive fresh goods at the lowest price, and a quality producer to find customers for their goods without advertising costs and without intermediaries. Such a mechanism can become a catalyst for the development of high-quality small business, especially in the manufacturing sector.
The creation of a neocommunist network, but in fact it is an ordinary social network with additional “body kits”, in my opinion, will allow humanity to enter the era of technological singularity under certain conditions. Yes, I believe that technological singularity is not associated with the creation of artificial intelligence, the appearance of which I personally consider very dangerous and unnecessary, but with the emergence of swarm intelligence from people. To create swarm intelligence, the necessary technical base already exists, a theoretical study of the process of swarm thinking itself and the creation of software for this are simply necessary. In my opinion, there are several necessary conditions for its creation:
1) understanding of all participants in the swarm thinking of its basic principles, which will be formed mainly empirically when coordinating the team of swarm intelligence, as a result of which the scientific base of swarm intelligence will be formed;
2) the participation of neural networks in the process of thinking (computing). Each participant should have direct and quick access to the formation and calculation of the neural network. For this, it is necessary to form a certain set of commands for managing neural networks;
3) the use of neural interfaces will significantly increase the performance of swarm intelligence.
In addition to creating swarm intelligence, the technological leap will also be ensured by the unlimited scalability of any type of activity. This will allow us to design and build not only cars and robots, but also entire cities. Only in the conditions of neo-communism is it possible to create gigaprojects, such as building a sector of the Dyson sphere or (and) terraforming planets. No state can afford such projects, especially in a market economy. They simply do not have enough money for the whole planet. At that time, if you mobilize intellectuals from all over the planet, you could accomplish something that you can only fantasize about nowadays (provided that all these intellectuals are provided with everything necessary for a quality life). For example, the terraforming of Venus by lowering its temperature to acceptable values, necessary for the life of bacteria that process carbon dioxide into oxygen (or for the work of robots that will do the same). To do this, it is enough to build a sector of the Dyson sphere, casting a shadow on Venus. The material for creating the Dyson sphere sector (silicon or, in the long term, silicon carbide and aluminum) could be taken from Mercury, for the development of which it is also necessary to solve non-trivial tasks, but for this, of course, you first need to develop electric engines for rockets (which something like a more efficient ion engine). After the terraforming of Venus, we get a high-tech twin of the Earth, but without water, which could be collected by trapping hydrogen from the solar wind in traps, which can also be immediately installed on the Dyson sphere. Also, after the completion of the construction of the Dyson sphere sector, At first it will be necessary to direct a significant part of its energy to accelerate the rotation of the planet around its axis in order to bring the period to 24 hours and thereby create the necessary magnetic field that protects from the ionizing radiation of the Sun. The same role should be played by traps in the sector of the Dyson sphere. It may seem to some that this all looks like a silly fantasy, but only swarm intelligence can really decide whether or not it is possible, due to the complexity of the idea, which will find flaws in the idea and correct them, or prove that the idea is completely inconsistent. Why is neocommunism able to do this? Yes, everything is simple - in neocommunism there is (or rather, new ideas of neocommunism will be added as a result of self-regulation) that is necessary for the geometric growth of the technical and technological base, as well as a high-quality human resource.
The ideas that I have presented, it seems to me, are simple, useful and easily implemented. Their implementation does not require going through wars or unrest, it is not necessary to build separate isolated cities (although this possibility, of course, is not excluded). They were created in order to create a society in which each person will not just be comfortable living, but he will feel truly happy without any artificial stimulants like drugs, alcohol and other rubbish. They blend well with human needs. Given all of the above, I believe that neo-communism is inevitable, i.e. small groups (communes) will begin to appear in the very near future, especially when you consider that these communes will have phenomenal “power”, because most often they will consist only of talented people, which means they will attract more and more new people to themselves, like a magnet, so I believe that everything is implemented in this idea in order to create the most powerful feedback that will enhance the intelligence of the communes, on the one hand, and another to attract new people and lead to mergers of communes. It is worth remembering only one thing - neocommunism has absorbed many features of communism, so do not forget that this structure is very similar in characteristics to diamond - it is monstrously solid and can change the shape of the star system, but just like a diamond burns on fire, communism also self-destructs immediately, as the number of idiots, traitors, or simply disgusting personalities in its system of governance passes for critical, of course I retell the history of the USSR. As for neocommunism, then his community will be his control system. All in all. So, for the destruction of neocommunism, we need the degradation of the entire community, which is quite difficult to do, especially if this community will timely detect factors directly or indirectly affecting it.
Introduction
Hello. My name is Sergey Matveev. It seems to me that I'm not quite adequate. The fact is that I want to change the world.
It all started with the fact that in childhood I considered myself a very stupid child (partly, of course, reasonably), despite the fact that I studied at school pretty well and ended up with a silver medal, but I was always ashamed of it because believed that he received it undeservedly.
Yes, I really spent almost all my time studying, except for the time when I was just physically unable to use my resources (well, of course, too lazy), but mastering the operation of the transistor, which I combined with studying the operation of electronic lamps, mastering derivatives, it took me years. Really years. Of course, I'm not talking about the fact that every day I sat on different books in which it was possible to study a specific problem from different angles. I studied the problems with just one first book that came across and tried to conduct many thought experiments, for which I simply did not have enough intelligence. I very keenly felt his lack. And when my eyes turned to the world that surrounds me, to how people behave, to how they plan and realize their life, how states function, everything what was going on around me, I was sure that I didn’t understand why everything was happening this way for one reason - I’m too stupid to understand this. But time passed. I entered the institute and began to notice that very often what I used to think was too complicated due to its genius of events turned out to be simply the result of someone unbearable stupidity. And when I began to become more and more convinced in my perception that people who make important decisions simply do not deserve to be in their places, then everything began to fall into place. I realized that there are too many idiots. Moreover, idiocy is a very real highly virulent disease that people easily contract with. I entered the institute and began to notice that very often what I used to think was too complicated due to its genius of events turned out to be simply the result of someone unbearable stupidity. And when I began to become more and more convinced in my perception that people who make important decisions simply do not deserve to be in their places, then everything began to fall into place. I realized that there are too many idiots. Moreover, idiocy is a very real highly virulent disease that people easily contract with. I entered the institute and began to notice that very often what I used to think was too complicated due to its genius of events turned out to be simply the result of someone unbearable stupidity. And when I began to become more and more convinced in my perception that people who make important decisions simply do not deserve to be in their places, then everything began to fall into place. I realized that there are too many idiots. Moreover, idiocy is a very real highly virulent disease that people easily contract with. just do not deserve to be in their places, then everything began to fall into place. I realized that there are too many idiots. Moreover, idiocy is a very real highly virulent disease that people easily contract with. just do not deserve to be in their places, then everything began to fall into place. I realized that there are too many idiots. Moreover, idiocy is a very real highly virulent disease that people easily contract with.
Awareness of this led me into a wild depression. The more I understood, the less I wanted to live in this world. I just became aware that I, by definition, cannot be happy in him. It has too much dirt, too much aggression, too much lies and too much cruelty, and all this is ensured by general stupidity, which skillfully mimics rationality. Together with personal problems, this led me to thoughts of suicide, from which I made, it seems to me, a very reasonable conclusion: “Yes, I am ready to die, but not rushing out of the window, or in some other idiotic way. I want to die from overload as a result of trying to change this world. " I believe that this is the ideal formula for suicide, because if I die, I will not lose anything, but on the contrary, I will acquire those fabulous moments that are found in the life of anyone, even the most unlucky person. Well, and besides, there is always a small chance that I will succeed in changing this world, and I will become a truly happy person! And I began my suicide by abandoning a formal education (institute), which by that time had completely ceased to be respected, and went to serve in the GRU special forces, from where I couldn’t escape from my weakness - they simply won’t let me do it ... It was not easy, but it was there that I got what I lacked the most — strength that I never had, and I always missed.
I have been a positive person since childhood. Almost did not participate in fights. I was not just afraid of fighting, I was afraid of conflict. It always seemed to me that conflict is a thing that is absolutely superfluous in human relations. Well, really, why conflict, if you can calmly discuss the problem and, having made concessions to each other, solve it.
Of course, I was a naive idiot, but why was ... I still think so, but with one caveat - there are those people with whom this works (and there are very few), but there are those with whom conflict is the only possible solution . This is what I best realized in the army. And it was there that the idea came that some people need to be isolated from each other. Isolate not on religious grounds, not on gender, not on nationality. Isolate from each other by psychotype, and only in this case the rational and the wise will become even better, and the dumb ... and nothing terrible will happen to the dumb.
In fact, the idea of something similar I had before the army. In my head was a project that I called Atlantis 7. Which was supposed to represent an Internet portal where the most talented could exchange experiences, tell which sources of information are the most digestible and truthful, educate each other, and just meet, communicate, love each other.
This project, of course, by definition did not include stupid people. He simply ignored them, and this, as I now think, is a significant mistake. First of all, because smart people always come from stupid people. Well, stupid people can not be ignored, because they are everywhere. You may come across a stupid doctor who will cripple you with his treatment or kill you. A dumb driver who thinks that you can ride red if you are in a hurry and knock someone close. And the worst thing is that these are not just pessimistic calculations, but facts. Today, tomorrow and the day after tomorrow there will be victims of stupidity. In general, I consider stupidity the worst human disease, from which more people died than from any other, including old age, because the root cause of most diseases, disasters, wars is human stupidity,
Here I would like to note that stupidity is an aggressive form of stupidity, and stupidity is inherent in every person. Every person in his life has done stupid things and therefore every person has the right to be stupid. Then how to separate stupid from stupid? Yes, it’s very simple: a stupid person realizes his stupidity and is ready to confide in the solution of complex problems, the solution of which he does not know, to more experienced and intelligent people, while a dumb person will always consider himself better and smarter than everyone else. A smart one will always consider himself stupid, because he understands how complex and diverse the world is and never can reach perfection and will always listen to someone else’s opinion, even if it’s the opinion of a stupid person, because even the most stupid one can say something very reasonable, and sometimes something stupid, but that makes sense, which can serve as a starting point for a rational idea. In fact, this separation is not of practical importance, but only purely theoretical. It is important to understand only one thing - it is necessary that stupid people do not suffer from the isolation of stupid people.
Thus, if we want to build an ideal society, then the first thing to do is to raise the banner “Reasonable people, unite!”
This is the basic part of the neocommunism formula, but a cry alone will not be enough. Here it is worth moving on to the very name - neocommunism. I use it precisely because in history there has already been a relatively successful experiment to create an ideal society. An experiment on us. And it so happened that, being born in the USSR, I captured a small island of communism (more precisely, socialism), which slowly faded away in the rays of capitalism. In my favorite urban-type village, I came across only its positive aspects, namely:
1) comfort. Yes, this is probably the most important thing that I felt there. Homeliness of a village arranged for itself, in which there were always freshly painted flowerbeds, arranged fences, enclosing gardens with flowers, a fountain, a club, on the paved area in front of which, various holidays were held ... - fading traces of the once prosperous Soviet mining village. A couple of Sovdep shops where you could buy the most delicious bread I have ever eaten, the most delicious eclairs and the most real ice cream - products, after which are “ordinary” for me, “capitalist”, so to speak, store things were perceived as something primerious or salted, with a taste of some chemistry. Yes, indeed, the choice of products was extremely scarce, but they were really high-quality, fresh products,
2) people. I am always amazed at the expression "man of Soviet hardening." How accurate is this definition. In my mind, people from the Soviet past are people from red-hot steel. And I always felt this according to their words, which they never threw into the wind and, of course, according to their actions. For me, the symbols of Soviet people will always be those sculptures of the Soviet era in which they were simply carved from stone, or forged from steel with these remnants of angularity or scale. What a magical feeling this is, when you understand that you can rely on a person without a bit of doubt in him, when it doesn’t even come to your mind that someone or your relatives can offend you, because you see people around you, which are warm in the eyes. Warm and simply indestructible strength obtained as a result of hard work. I didn’t understand then
I would like to revive all the best that was in the Soviet Union, and there was a lot of the best:
1) a culture that nurtured spirit, mutual assistance, ingenuity, in which there was no hatred and anger, there was no fear;
2) science, which to this day, in my opinion, is the standard. Those who read Soviet textbooks, I am sure, immediately fall in love with the presentation of the material, which, as a rule, is chewed very well and it is always clear that the book was written by a real expert in this matter. An expert who at the same time understands that he explains the material to a beginner and therefore uses simple speech, chewing complex words;
3) standards that have enveloped all areas of production activity. Including due to the standards, high quality of all products was ensured;
4) ideology, which for some reason is usually blamed. Yes, I do not approve of the glorification of the leader, I do not approve of too strict censorship, but according to the remnants of culture that have come down to us, the ideology was primarily to educate worthy citizens who could not only peacefully but coexist, work hard and work together and get pleasure from their work. I am sure that a person is not able to live in the absence of ideology - where the absence of ideology is declared, in fact it is, it is simply not centralized and is formed under the influence of the most informational and influential circles, which, as a rule, large companies become. In the absence of ideology, in fact, information excerpts from advertisements, films, videos, and radio broadcasts become the reference point to which a person (mainly children) will pay attention,
For a very long time I have been interested in the question: “How did the Soviet Union turn into Russia of the 90s?” There are various conspiracy theories which, it seems to me, have the right to life, there are economic justifications, but for me personally this does not matter. I want to understand how Soviet people, among whom it was cruel, were punished not by thieves, but even by those harmless by today's standards, as unemployed, under the article for parasitism (even Viktor Tsoi had to work as a fireman), people who were always very sympathetic , turned into those who do not care about everyone except themselves. And in my thoughts and observations I came to the following opinion: “The ideology of capitalism, or rather, the lack of its own ideology, was to blame.”
Why is capitalism bad?
Honestly, since childhood, I believed that capitalism is an ideal form of government and that was a very wonderful example - the USA, ideal in every sense. A high standard of living for all segments of the population, people are happy with their lives and the rest of the world envies them. I was also envious and wanted to go there to live, when it was clear to me that Russia was a country of victorious corruption, criminals, drunkards — all this was strongly felt in the 90s. Since childhood, I did not accept that all people can be equated. Talented people should not receive as many benefits as those who do everything through their sleeves, as was the case in the Soviet Union. I was always sure that competition, which ideally should lead to talented people opening their own firms, starting a business, competing with other organizers in their business, should lead to the improvement of the world as a whole. Indeed, according to the logic of capitalism, the most talented, i.e. the one who organizes business for people, i.e. creates the best quality goods, provides the best quality services and all this at the most optimal prices. So it was supposed to be. But it turned out that competition could be quite different. And now it is too clearly seen that this “other” competition is becoming decisive at the present time. What are its basic principles? And now it is too clearly seen that this “other” competition is becoming decisive at the present time. What are its basic principles? And now it is too clearly seen that this “other” competition is becoming decisive at the present time. What are its basic principles?
Конкуренция — это зло
The competition may be different. In sports, the competition is that the most prepared wins. That is how it should be. But there are those who are beginning to cheat - doping, various tricks to lower the morale of the opponent, etc. So now I see capitalism. Every year, “life hackers” begin to play an increasing role in the world, finding holes in the not-so-slender idea of capitalism, that is, those people who clearly noticed that in order to defeat a competitor it is not necessary to be better than him. Quite the contrary - you need to be mercantile, insidious and preferably a killer. The need for commercialism and deceit is manifested in the fact that if you use the cheapest components and technologies in production, and present it as some kind of innovation, and at the same time clog the information channels with false advertising, then you can get significantly more benefits than if you do everything honestly, because at the same time everything will be according to the law. I mentioned that you need to be a killer, not only and not so much because you can squeeze business from others in this way, but because sometimes for the business the most optimal in terms of profit is indirect destruction of people. The growth of tobacco and alcohol companies, the artificially high prices for medicines, the promotion of antisocial behavior, to promote certain goods, services, "works of art" - all this is clearly visible now. The most interesting thing is that world society itself has not changed much in terms of understanding life ideals and values, but it is increasingly beginning to consume what contradicts them for one very good reason - a lie. Lying has become the most important tool for promoting a business, as for policy promotion. The main reason for this course of affairs is the lack of control over the lies on the part of the state, as it was in the Soviet Union, and the absence of any significant mechanisms of control on the part of society. Those. of course, some control tools are still available, but they are scattered and do not stop the lie, which in turn becomes more difficult to recognize and, most importantly, it becomes more difficult to convict of it, because mechanisms of lies are being improved. which in turn is becoming increasingly difficult to recognize and, most importantly, it is becoming more difficult to convict in it, because mechanisms of lies are being improved. which in turn is becoming increasingly difficult to recognize and, most importantly, it is becoming more difficult to convict in it, because mechanisms of lies are being improved.
Screening Mechanisms
The most actively used are such methods of masking lies as:
1) understatement, i.e. the logical chain of truthful informational messages leads to a false conclusion, although this conclusion itself is absent in the message, which means that there is no formal excuse for the proceedings. In this case, the message contains only those truthful messages that give it the necessary semantic coloring, while contradictory truthful messages are silent;
2) erosion of meaning, i.e. the message chain has a double meaning - the obvious meaning necessary for the audience, which is the main goal of the chain and not obvious, which is necessary for formal justification;
3) attracting reputable people to promote goods and services. This becomes possible, because in most cases only the size of the reward is important for the relevant authority involved. The credibility in the information message, of course, clearly never indicates the shortcomings of what it advertises, as a result of which these shortcomings seem insignificant or even absent.
Existing capitalism leads to dystopia
The richest companies in the existing conditions are those who lie better than everyone, i.e. those who can sell cheap goods or services for expensive, paying as little as possible to their employees and the state. Obviously, it is hardly worth relying on the fact that such companies will contribute to the prosperity of the world, although they, of course, will declare it. Such companies will always absorb competitors and destroy them, especially those who point to lies. Those who reveal the lie automatically become the enemies of the most influential, which means they will be destroyed, and the most effective and reliable way to destroy those who notice the lie is numbness. Thus, human dullness is not only an easily spreading difficult to cure disease, but also greenhouse conditions are created intentionally for it, because it is food for the further growth of capitalism. I am deeply convinced that the growth of such capitalism will lead to the collapse of society as a result of wars. And I’m not even talking about a global war, the likelihood of which will only grow, but I’m talking about the fundamental desire for fierce competition, in which everyone will try to tear the tidbit directly from the teeth of a competitor. I am sure this road will lead to the inhumanization of the whole world. Of course, this road is very long, but this does not change the fact that the end will still be and I think that it will be something like in “Universe 25”. and I'm talking about the fundamental desire for fierce competition, in which everyone will try to tear the tidbit directly from the teeth of a competitor. I am sure this road will lead to the inhumanization of the whole world. Of course, this road is very long, but this does not change the fact that the end will still be and I think that it will be something like in “Universe 25”. and I'm talking about the fundamental desire for fierce competition, in which everyone will try to tear the tidbit directly from the teeth of a competitor. I am sure this road will lead to the inhumanization of the whole world. Of course, this road is very long, but this does not change the fact that the end will still be and I think that it will be something like in “Universe 25”.
Выход, конечно же, есть
The way out of this aggravating situation I see is building a society of the most educated and wise people of mankind and transferring to it all the resources of the planet (or by that time the planets) (I would like to recall that the idea is not new - it is already being used in the framework of the “Venus Project” but he is engaged in the design of an appropriate future, while I propose moving immediately to action), but the problem is where to find this society and who will voluntarily agree to transfer resources to it ... As for the first question, for me about vet is obvious - bring up. Yes, we can educate those who can build a harmonious, well-balanced world, but I mean not only and not so much raise our children, but rather educate ourselves, because the highest qualities, namely honesty, honesty, perseverance, Kindness cannot be imposed, nor can it be (or at least quite difficult) to instill in a person the motivation to participate in this. If a person is kind, then this is solely the result of his own choice, and not a combination of circumstances, but at the same time, of course, you should not miss the influence of circumstances on this fact.
How is it possible to educate yourself so as to become the leader of something big and bright? And how can you create a society that will consist entirely of such worthy people? I voiced the answer at the very beginning - to unite. Unite under the auspices of personal growth, self-improvement. But here we come to the problem of what we live in the real world, where we want to eat, live somewhere, help our loved ones, and if we are lucky, we also enjoy life. It turns out that it is necessary to add functionality to this society to make money - the universally recognized equivalent of our earthly goods. But perhaps this contradicts the original goal - self-development? No, just the opposite. Just imagine what kind of things a crowd of intellectuals can do, provided they read a fable about a swan, a crab and a pike. Even a few smart people, United by a common plan, I am sure, can turn mountains. All that is needed for this is to provide them with the exchange of information and the creation of such jobs in which they can work effectively and multiply each other's achievements. And in addition to making money, it will also be the easiest and most reliable way to self-development, of course, if this making money will be associated with intellectual or artistic activity.
How to provide a good job in the existing world? Yes, nothing is simpler, you just need to provide a software environment in which they can exchange ideas, and it’s better to do their work directly, for example, at the same time, seeing each other’s results, designing a new robot, or writing a new musical composition together, or writing a script together to a new film, or to create a cartoon together. Thus, the most important thing that such a society needs is programmers who will ensure the work of the society, as well as create other works of technical creativity for society and the rest of the world. It is the caste of programmers that must be the very first and most privileged. Yes, it is privileged, because I have already said that I am against equalization of rights. Each member of society should make a profit and have some social status according to the principles of meritocracy, i.e. in accordance with the invested work, and more importantly, in accordance with the invested contribution, which may include, among other things, the proposal of some brilliant idea. How will such a design differ from a regular company? Firstly, people will be consolidated around the idea that interests them the most, and secondly, they will be matched to each other in accordance with the psychotype and the achievements available at that time. The most popular, respectively, will be those who have the most achievements, and accordingly will have (should have) the most privileges and the greatest remuneration for their work, the greatest fame. Moreover, the division into psychotypes will contribute to that for those types of activities those who are best at this activity will be suitable. In this sense, the most obvious division, it seems to me, will be the division of people into those who generate ideas and performers, because these are fundamentally different types of activities and usually one who generates ideas well can rarely do something, just like and someone who is well versed in any technology can rarely come up with something original, although in both cases, of course, there are exceptions, but such a separation, as I see it, will be very effective. Of course, there should be a fundamental division into types of activities, but it is much more important to distinguish a manager, i.e. the one who will follow the design of the task, divide it into subtasks and make the final decision. The fact, that disagreements often arise in collective tasks. Disagreements can be resolved by voting among the working group, voting among the entire community (or a community group selected by any criterion), or when all studies appear controversial, they must be resolved by the manager. I would also like to point out that I see a huge role behind the open source, i.e. I believe that, ideally, the result of labor should be a product with fully open source code (including for closed commercial use) - this will allow each subsequent group to enjoy the fruits of the previous work. And I mean not only programs. For example, it would be a good idea to create an electric car with open documentation and the corresponding opportunity to improve the model and, of course, the ability to print an electric car on a 3D printer and to independently produce its elements on machines in “home conditions”. The same people in virtual professions will also have to develop conveyor systems for the automatic assembly of real objects, so far at the project level, for their implementation in the future, so that neocommunism can move on to the next stage - the industrial one.
Thus, the first step in building neocommunism should be the creation of an environment in which people will improve themselves and create something in a virtual environment, i.e. the main role at the first stage belongs to programmers, designers, musicians, artists and other representatives of professions that fully fit into the virtual world.
The second stage should be the redemption (rental) of premises where one could gather for meetings and discussions of various tasks, as well as just for a good time, preferably with the opportunity to spend the night there, eat, relax, i.e. places where people would feel as comfortable as possible - this will significantly strengthen the relationship between people, create opportunities for work of labor collectives.
The third stage should be the repurchase of production facilities, where it would be possible to place 3D printers, machine tools, robots and other production equipment with maximum automation capabilities, capable of producing the widest possible range of real objects. First of all, it is necessary to produce production equipment at such production facilities, because, as expected, it will be greatly missed by the growing number of interested users of the system.
Political interests
Depending on the number of users of the system, it may be possible to create its own political force, which will promote the interests of the community within the state (or even states). So for example, lobbying for laws allowing the use of homemade electric cars may be required. In addition, such a political force will be able to bring order to the political system of the state and smoothly merge with the state apparatus.
Mutual assistance
With the growth of well-being of users of the system, they will have the opportunity to help other people, including those who are not in the system. First of all, in my opinion, it should be about helping children, and I’m talking not only about orphans, but also about those children who are actually abandoned (or even intimidated as a result of domestic violence) by their parents - such situations too much is happening now - the increased demand for suicide, alcoholism, and smoking among children is a clear evidence of this. Help for children (and not only for children, but in general for people in difficult life situations, but primarily for children) should be carried out according to a "detective" mechanism, i.e. it is necessary to implement a search mechanism for such children by scanning social networks, using cries to which people will respond not necessarily with help, and even just the information that they know who needs help. The community will help in such difficult situations either by patronage or by involving the police and social services in the problem. As for orphans, then I consider it acceptable and even necessary to embed advertising in the system of children. I don’t know how it can be called differently, but the point is to inform society as fully as possible about children who need help, or rather parents. Here, the selection of children for guardianship by psychotype should also play a positive role, in order to provide children and their new parents with the most comfortable conditions. Mutual assistance should play a special role with regard to women. The fact is that I do not just support feminism, but I believe that women should have many more rights than men. Women are what which makes the main point, so their problems need to be addressed first. They should have a more unloaded work schedule and a more loaded schedule of rest with interesting, exciting events, and not as they say "this is it." I'm not talking about violence against women. In my opinion, it is the psychological state of women that is the main litmus test that determines the health of society.
Служба безопасности
As I have already said, violence and cruelty are now very powerful. You can run into crime anywhere, and besides, as I think, he will try to integrate himself into the system, therefore, to protect the interests of each participant in the system, I suggest creating a security service whose role will be completely civilian, namely getting into difficult conflict situations and their legal decision. I, as a person who once worked in the economic security service of a very large bank, I can say, having worked with the police, that very often, it needs to be forced into legal actions, and there are appropriate mechanisms for this. Also very often a person needs not the police, but just support. Unfortunately, now domestic violence is becoming the scourge of our society and to resolve such internal problems, in which the least protected usually suffer, i.e. women and children, constant monitoring of such families is necessary. The police (precinct) and guardianship authorities, unfortunately, are not always able to provide it due to the fact that each time it depends on a particular precinct or other public servant. Also, the security service can engage in socially useful activities, for example, the study of various criminal systems of deceit and even kidnapping, i.e. actually detective work. She should also deal with the destruction of such phenomena as the Blue Whale, which once again emphasizes the deplorable psychological health situation among children, which directly depends on the climate in the family. not always able to provide it due to the fact that each time it depends on a particular district or other civil servant. Also, the security service can engage in socially useful activities, for example, the study of various criminal systems of deceit and even kidnapping, i.e. actually detective work. She should also deal with the destruction of such phenomena as the Blue Whale, which once again emphasizes the deplorable psychological health situation among children, which directly depends on the climate in the family. not always able to provide it due to the fact that each time it depends on a particular district or other civil servant. Also, the security service can engage in socially useful activities, for example, the study of various criminal systems of deceit and even kidnapping, i.e. actually detective work. She should also deal with the destruction of such phenomena as the Blue Whale, which once again emphasizes the deplorable psychological health situation among children, which directly depends on the climate in the family. actually detective work. She should also deal with the destruction of such phenomena as the Blue Whale, which once again emphasizes the deplorable psychological health situation among children, which directly depends on the climate in the family. actually detective work. She should also deal with the destruction of such phenomena as the Blue Whale, which once again emphasizes the deplorable psychological health situation among children, which directly depends on the climate in the family.
Неокоммунизм прост в реализации
As can be seen from the description that I proposed, neocommunism is a hybrid of capitalism and communism, therefore it can also be called neocapitalism, i.e. capitalism in which holes are patched. It is completely built on the platform of capitalism, i.e. It does not require any revolutions. It does not require that the whole society be part of it. Neocommunism is just a social network, organized by its own rules and having real manifestations in life, in the form of LLC, political forces and production facilities. Those who will not use the system will not lose anything regarding their current situation, while those who will use it will simply gain additional opportunities. This form is convenient because it allows you to exclude the user from the system for his inhuman behavior (murder, violence, theft). A person excluded from the system will only lose additional opportunities, but at the same time will be able to use the publicly available (informational) part of the system, but will not be able to take part in it. An important point here is the yoke problem. By law, a person who has served his term in prison is considered to have atoned for his guilt, and personally I do not deny this. However, I believe that information on a person’s criminal record should be publicly available (article, circumstances of the case, which sometimes change the attitude even towards a murderer, for example, a murdered rapist of his child). So a person who has served time for pedophilia (or has recovered in a psychiatric hospital) should be “on a pencil”, i.e. he should not be allowed to even get close to the children, despite the fact that the law allows this, like people who have been in prison should not fall into power.
Почему секта — это хорошо?
In the minds of most people, it is clearly fixed that a sect is a community created with the goal of washing the brain, taking apartments, and generally destroying the individual. And this is not surprising - there are so many examples, but why do people even go to sects? Did they all want to part with real estate, lose their identity? Not. And we come to sugar, which lures people into sects, and sugar is a feeling of collectivity, mutual support, even if fake. But what if you create a "sect" in which there are no attempts to take money, there is no brainwashing with mythical ideas. What if you create a community in which there will simply be people who are willing to support each other? I am sure that such a community cannot exist without an ideology that will draw in new "adherents." But what if this ideology is the most common, classical morality, and the quality of the reference books will be all world literature with a classical interpretation of morality? Indeed, it will be an ideal “sect” in which, on the one hand, there will be meetings with mutual psychological support, communication, joint work and rest, and on the other, it will not have all the negative sides for which sects do not like it. So we come to the generally accessible social manifestation of neocommunism - small or large associations of people in which everyone knows everything about the rest of the members and thus eliminates the likelihood of “random” people who could ruin the aura of mutual assistance and mutual support. communication, joint work and rest, and on the other hand, she will not have all the negative sides for which sects are so disliked. So we come to the generally accessible social manifestation of neocommunism - small or large associations of people in which everyone knows everything about the rest of the members and thus eliminates the likelihood of “random” people who could ruin the aura of mutual assistance and mutual support. communication, joint work and rest, and on the other hand, she will not have all the negative sides for which sects are so disliked. So we come to the generally accessible social manifestation of neocommunism - small or large associations of people in which everyone knows everything about the rest of the members and thus eliminates the likelihood of “random” people who could ruin the aura of mutual assistance and mutual support.
Professionals - Leading
A network that reflects gratitude to users, their achievements and work, their participation in common good deeds, would be an excellent platform for advertising themselves. For what purposes, in order to take a good job, or to run for deputy, or just to find yourself an amazing girl (guy) who (who) will appreciate your talents, it does not matter. It is important that this is an honest way to make yourself known.
Research
If you collect a huge number of people at one point, information from which with a high degree of probability can be considered reliable, this opens up tremendous opportunities for research and experimentation. It would be great if ordinary people could share their successful stories on curing various diseases, and professionals hypothesize the reasons for the cure and conduct relevant studies (including in the framework of professional laboratories). Thus, it would be possible to identify ideal treatment regimens for specific diseases for people with different characteristics, i.e. it is also necessary to identify what the features of the course of the disease can be in different people and how to predict them, put forward tips for the prevention of diseases, which I consider even more significant. I am categorically against the statement that that self-medication is bad. The reason is the same stupidity (and sometimes just not enough education or material interest in promoting a specific medicine or device for treatment or something else), which does not bypass many doctors. At least, I have not come across this many times and came to a simple conclusion: you can figure out any disease, especially when you are vitally interested in this and this interest is likely to make you smarter than your doctor. I would like to give specific examples. I was very sick in childhood and I always wondered why there was no single, effective treatment regimen for the common cold. Yes, it’s clear that everyone has a different organism, but the bacteria are almost all the same. This is me about the fact that if there was an effective and safe bactericidal agent, then it would be possible to quickly treat a cold. At the very least, it would be great if each medicine would have open information about in vitro and in vivo studies, in which it would be clear which bacteria affect the effectiveness of a particular drug. And of course, it is desirable that these studies be carried out on ordinary people who live a real life, and do not sit in sterile boxes, and besides, those who no one paid for these studies, but on the contrary, they paid with their health, and so would be interested in telling the truth. As a result of reflection and a little research, it became clear that there is a small set of universal, relatively safe antiseptics that destroy the widest range of microbes: miramistin, chlorhexidine and hydrogen peroxide. According to the description, chlorhexidine is the most aggressive, for external use only, while miramistin is acceptable for ingestion. I tried miramistin to treat a cold - the effect turned out to be zero and I started looking for information on whether it is permissible to get such a simple and understandable substance as hydrogen peroxide inside the body. What consequences can this lead to. Given its formula, which is very close to the formula of water, I thought it was a fairly safe substance (heavy metals or something poisonous cannot be the reaction products), but with acidic properties. I found information on the Internet that even someone is drinking it. This was enough for me to try to instill a strongly diluted solution (I can be wrong, but I think about 1.0%) in my nose to treat a runny nose (after which, forgive me for blowing my nose for details). And I was very surprised by the effect, - a runny nose passed almost instantly. Of course, I still don’t know how safe it is and whether it can lead to any problems, but as a goal for a multiple experiment among volunteers, I think this experiment would be interesting if the risk was first assessed by professionals.
In addition, I personally am very annoyed by the dominance of generics at inflated prices. It’s one thing if generics are more effective for some reason than a prototype drug, and then it needs experimental research and justification, and it’s quite another thing when they are pushed into the market with aggressive advertising and all kinds of blocking of much cheaper drugs- prototypes (usually this happens automatically from the pharmacy chains, which receive a fixed percentage of sales, which means they are not profitable for cheap drugs). You can also often find a placebo at the price of an elixir of youth, which brings profit to its manufacturer only thanks to false advertising.
Medical paradoxes are also annoying. Sometimes just disgusting in their idiocy. Here I want to recall about the treatment of hepatitis C, which is still often carried out with the help of outdated ultra-expensive drugs with a huge number of harsh side effects, which do not guarantee a complete cure (they are certainly advised by the appropriate doctors), while judging by the forums ( this, of course, also needs confirmation) the highly effective safe medicine Sofosbuvir has been released. Moreover, its generic can be bought in India or China, saving a few hundred thousand rubles (there are much less patent fees for this medicine due to epidemics), but not a single doctor will likely say this. In other words, being treated officially for hepatitis C in Russia is both expensive and life-threatening.
Also, I personally would be interested in what substances and how they affect bacteria, viruses and fungi. And I’m talking not only about medicines, but also about herbs and some household substances: salt, vinegar, juices, Coca-Cola (due to the content of phosphoric acid, I think it can have a similar effect), etc. about physical effects (cold, heat, ultraviolet, infrared light).
Research, of course, may apply to other areas of life. For example, a study of ordinary consumer goods is needed. Now there is a very good universal system for researching goods, Yandex.Market, which does a very good job of this, having on board not only a review system, but also a review output system, as well as discussion of goods. However, I consider this approach to be incomplete, because it does not include information on product improvement, and information on ideal product combinations; moreover, the review system uses a universal assessment, while a separate assessment of individual products would be more accurate qualities of goods. So an example of product improvement is installing Linux instead of Windows on a laptop or tablet, which is not always a trivial task, which professionals could describe in more detail, or indicate that at the moment a full transition to Linux is not possible, due to the lack of some drivers or signed bootloaders. An example of a combination of products is an Arduino module with a specific Blutooth extension, for which you can immediately post a firmware listing. As for voting on the quality of goods, in the voting system on the phone’s camera, one could add a couple (or more) of pictures taken by the corresponding device in the dark and in the light and vote on a photo, or even connect an automatic graphics quality analyzer that estimates which any signs (assessment of the real resolution of the photograph (or vice versa, blur), assessment of colors, etc.). that at the moment, a full transition to Linux is not possible, due to the lack of some drivers or signed bootloaders. An example of a combination of products is an Arduino module with a specific Blutooth extension, for which you can immediately post a firmware listing. As for voting on the quality of goods, in the voting system on the phone’s camera, one could add a couple (or more) of pictures taken by the corresponding device in the dark and in the light and vote on a photo, or even connect an automatic graphics quality analyzer that estimates which any signs (assessment of the real resolution of the photograph (or vice versa, blur), assessment of colors, etc.). that at the moment, a full transition to Linux is not possible, due to the lack of some drivers or signed bootloaders. An example of a combination of products is an Arduino module with a specific Blutooth extension, for which you can immediately post a firmware listing. As for voting on the quality of goods, in the voting system on the phone’s camera, one could add a couple (or more) of pictures taken by the corresponding device in the dark and in the light and vote on a photo, or even connect an automatic graphics quality analyzer that estimates which any signs (assessment of the real resolution of the photograph (or vice versa, blur), assessment of colors, etc.). An example of a combination of products is an Arduino module with a specific Blutooth extension, for which you can immediately post a firmware listing. As for voting on the quality of goods, in the voting system on the phone’s camera, one could add a couple (or more) of pictures taken by the corresponding device in the dark and in the light and vote on a photo, or even connect an automatic graphics quality analyzer that estimates which any signs (assessment of the real resolution of the photograph (or vice versa, blur), assessment of colors, etc.). An example of a combination of products is an Arduino module with a specific Blutooth extension, for which you can immediately post a firmware listing. As for voting on the quality of goods, in the voting system on the phone’s camera, one could add a couple (or more) of pictures taken by the corresponding device in the dark and in the light and vote on a photo, or even connect an automatic graphics quality analyzer that estimates which any signs (assessment of the real resolution of the photograph (or vice versa, blur), assessment of colors, etc.).
Прямая закупка
At the moment, there is no collective procurement mechanism, which would solve many problems. So, for example, very often farms, producing high-quality goods at a low price, cannot get through to the buyer due to a number of restrictions - on the one hand, their goods are not advertised, or rather, their advertising is crowded out by larger TNCs, on the other, in order to get into retail chains, you need to pay significant money, which is often not affordable for small farms. If you introduce a map of farms and industries on which there would be an assessment of the products of each farm, or even better, the results of inspection of these farms with photographs and videos, as well as information on laboratory studies of goods, as well as provide for the possibility of collective purchase, i.e. funds are raised for the purchase, the packer is hired on them, which will distribute the goods to end customers in accordance with their orders, and of course, payment is made for goods at the factory and payment for delivery. The goods themselves can be picked up at unloading points (equipped or not equipped), or in stores that agree to such cooperation. This approach will allow end customers to receive fresh goods at the lowest price, and a quality producer to find customers for their goods without advertising costs and without intermediaries. Such a mechanism can become a catalyst for the development of high-quality small business, especially in the manufacturing sector. or in stores that agree to such cooperation. This approach will allow end customers to receive fresh goods at the lowest price, and a quality producer to find customers for their goods without advertising costs and without intermediaries. Such a mechanism can become a catalyst for the development of high-quality small business, especially in the manufacturing sector. or in stores that agree to such cooperation. This approach will allow end customers to receive fresh goods at the lowest price, and a quality producer to find customers for their goods without advertising costs and without intermediaries. Such a mechanism can become a catalyst for the development of high-quality small business, especially in the manufacturing sector.
A fundamentally new technological level
The creation of a neocommunist network, but in fact it is an ordinary social network with additional “body kits”, in my opinion, will allow humanity to enter the era of technological singularity under certain conditions. Yes, I believe that technological singularity is not associated with the creation of artificial intelligence, the appearance of which I personally consider very dangerous and unnecessary, but with the emergence of swarm intelligence from people. To create swarm intelligence, the necessary technical base already exists, a theoretical study of the process of swarm thinking itself and the creation of software for this are simply necessary. In my opinion, there are several necessary conditions for its creation:
1) understanding of all participants in the swarm thinking of its basic principles, which will be formed mainly empirically when coordinating the team of swarm intelligence, as a result of which the scientific base of swarm intelligence will be formed;
2) the participation of neural networks in the process of thinking (computing). Each participant should have direct and quick access to the formation and calculation of the neural network. For this, it is necessary to form a certain set of commands for managing neural networks;
3) the use of neural interfaces will significantly increase the performance of swarm intelligence.
In addition to creating swarm intelligence, the technological leap will also be ensured by the unlimited scalability of any type of activity. This will allow us to design and build not only cars and robots, but also entire cities. Only in the conditions of neo-communism is it possible to create gigaprojects, such as building a sector of the Dyson sphere or (and) terraforming planets. No state can afford such projects, especially in a market economy. They simply do not have enough money for the whole planet. At that time, if you mobilize intellectuals from all over the planet, you could accomplish something that you can only fantasize about nowadays (provided that all these intellectuals are provided with everything necessary for a quality life). For example, the terraforming of Venus by lowering its temperature to acceptable values, necessary for the life of bacteria that process carbon dioxide into oxygen (or for the work of robots that will do the same). To do this, it is enough to build a sector of the Dyson sphere, casting a shadow on Venus. The material for creating the Dyson sphere sector (silicon or, in the long term, silicon carbide and aluminum) could be taken from Mercury, for the development of which it is also necessary to solve non-trivial tasks, but for this, of course, you first need to develop electric engines for rockets (which something like a more efficient ion engine). After the terraforming of Venus, we get a high-tech twin of the Earth, but without water, which could be collected by trapping hydrogen from the solar wind in traps, which can also be immediately installed on the Dyson sphere. Also, after the completion of the construction of the Dyson sphere sector, At first it will be necessary to direct a significant part of its energy to accelerate the rotation of the planet around its axis in order to bring the period to 24 hours and thereby create the necessary magnetic field that protects from the ionizing radiation of the Sun. The same role should be played by traps in the sector of the Dyson sphere. It may seem to some that this all looks like a silly fantasy, but only swarm intelligence can really decide whether or not it is possible, due to the complexity of the idea, which will find flaws in the idea and correct them, or prove that the idea is completely inconsistent. Why is neocommunism able to do this? Yes, everything is simple - in neocommunism there is (or rather, new ideas of neocommunism will be added as a result of self-regulation) that is necessary for the geometric growth of the technical and technological base, as well as a high-quality human resource.
Неокоммунизм неизбежен
The ideas that I have presented, it seems to me, are simple, useful and easily implemented. Their implementation does not require going through wars or unrest, it is not necessary to build separate isolated cities (although this possibility, of course, is not excluded). They were created in order to create a society in which each person will not just be comfortable living, but he will feel truly happy without any artificial stimulants like drugs, alcohol and other rubbish. They blend well with human needs. Given all of the above, I believe that neo-communism is inevitable, i.e. small groups (communes) will begin to appear in the very near future, especially when you consider that these communes will have phenomenal “power”, because most often they will consist only of talented people, which means they will attract more and more new people to themselves, like a magnet, so I believe that everything is implemented in this idea in order to create the most powerful feedback that will enhance the intelligence of the communes, on the one hand, and another to attract new people and lead to mergers of communes. It is worth remembering only one thing - neocommunism has absorbed many features of communism, so do not forget that this structure is very similar in characteristics to diamond - it is monstrously solid and can change the shape of the star system, but just like a diamond burns on fire, communism also self-destructs immediately, as the number of idiots, traitors, or simply disgusting personalities in its system of governance passes for critical, of course I retell the history of the USSR. As for neocommunism, then his community will be his control system. All in all. So, for the destruction of neocommunism, we need the degradation of the entire community, which is quite difficult to do, especially if this community will timely detect factors directly or indirectly affecting it.