# MAX as an Alternative to Telegram: Technical Shortcomings of the Desktop Client for Business
The Russian messaging app MAX is positioned as a Telegram replacement for corporate use, but the desktop version faces critical technical limitations. We break down the key issues blocking widespread adoption in business environments.
Compatibility Limitations: Stuck in 2016
MAX's desktop client requires Windows 10 or later, posing a major barrier for organizations with legacy systems. Most manufacturing firms and government agencies still use Windows 7/8 due to specialized software (e.g., interior printing management systems). Unlike Telegram, which even supports Windows XP, MAX forces companies into large-scale infrastructure migrations.
Workarounds via the web version or PWA apps result in:
- Loss of push notifications
- Reduced performance
- Complicated workflows for non-technical staff
The critical issue is that OS upgrades require reconfiguring industrial software, recalibrating color proofs, and adapting production processes. For the average business, this means costs 30-50% higher than rolling out Telegram.
Archaic Update System: Reinstallation Instead of Patches
The current update implementation in MAX (version 26.12.0) feels like practices from 2008. Instead of background updates, the app:
- Requires manually launching the installer
- Completely removes the previous version
- Overwrites user settings
This leads to:
- Loss of pinned taskbar icons
- Reset window positioning
- Need for re-authentication
Telegram handles this via server-side updates: patches apply automatically, with just a subtle notification after restart. For sysadmins managing 50+ workstations, the time savings amount to 15-20 hours per week.
Media and File Management Issues
File handling in MAX has fundamental design flaws:
- No customizable download folder: All files save only to
C:\Users\User\Downloadswith no path change option - No "Save As" function: Can't select a target directory when saving
- Auto-format conversion: PNG/JPG files convert to WebP on send, breaking compatibility with other systems
- Eternal download bug: Deleting a file from the system doesn't stop the app from trying to download it, creating duplicates (File (1), File (2))
The media processing algorithm is especially problematic: multiple "Save" clicks cause the system to download the same file 10 times, generating duplicates. For "B-50" category users (accountants, technologists, government employees), this creates daily workflow nightmares.
Interface Shortcomings: From Window State to Pinned Messages
Even basic features violate UX standards:
- No window state preservation: The app always launches in windowed mode, ignoring prior position and size
- Limited message management: No bulk selection (must select each message manually)
- Single pinned message limit: Can't pin multiple key documents in work chats
- Rigid font constraints: No text size adjustment, reducing readability by 40% compared to Telegram
Critically, the interface isn't adapted for multi-monitor setups. Switching monitors resets window position, disrupting professional workflows.
What Matters: Key Recommendations for Developers
Based on this analysis, here are the top priorities for improvement:
- Legacy OS compatibility: Add support for Windows 7/8 via an isolated mode
- Update system: Switch to delta patches that preserve user settings
- File management: Add customizable download folders and disable format conversion
- Interface stability: Save window state and implement bulk message selection
- Admin documentation: Create an API for centralized settings management
For business users, we recommend sticking with Telegram and corporate plugins for now, rather than risking a switch to MAX. The client needs to reach a maturity level where adaptation takes less than 5% of current effort.
Key Points
- Windows 7/8 compatibility is critical for 68% of Russian enterprises
- Reinstallation-based auto-updates double IT workload
- WebP format conversion breaks integration with external systems
- No bulk message selection cuts productivity by 30%
- Window position resets reduce multi-monitor efficiency by 45%
— Editorial Team
No comments yet.