Does Google continue to corrode unwanted Android developers?

On July 24, I received a letter stating that one of my applications was deleted due to a violation of the provision for paid and free applications and clause 3.3 of the agreement. In other words, Google found that my free application uses third-party payment systems. There were no third-party payment systems in the application itself. It had:

1. Google’s in-app billing for lifetime ad cuts
2. Link to a site where you can fund your account not through Google

Of course, the second point is a bad decision, and probably that is what they did not like. When I looked for information on this issue, I found answers like “in such a system no one cares what’s on your site, the main thing is that there isn’t in the application." An example was given by Evernote. I did not check the information, I trusted this reasoning and, apparently, this was my main mistake.
The letter said that I can fix the error and unload the updated application with a different package name. I immediately removed the link to the site and uploaded the corrected application. At the same time, I sent them a letter asking them to see if everything is in order and give them the opportunity to fix it if something is suddenly wrong. A few minutes later a ticket came that the letter was received for processing. After 4 hours, a message came that the new application was blocked for the same reason. And another 20 hours later a letter arrived that the entire developer account was already blocked in connection with repeated violations of the rules and the agreement. The letter also said that you should not try to register a new account, because we will calculate you anyway, ban again, but we will not refund the money for registration; please use other ways to distribute your applications.
Then there were appeals to Google and numerous letters to me from users who asked where this or that application disappeared. Some of these users subsequently wrote to the Google Play user support service asking them to return the applications, which they were refused in the spirit of “we don’t know anything, it was either the developer who uninstalled the application or he violated the rules.” Some particularly annoying users were later sent to write to the developer support service, whence they replied that this application is not yours, let the author write. My appeals were rejected with a template note, which can be briefly described as “we looked, you violated, we won’t change our decision and don’t write to us anymore.” I must say that in general all the answers are always stereotyped and one gets the feeling that appeals in principle do not read.