Purple squiggles

“And a bad PSC generator is good for something.”

Crescent with a retort

In the process of working on one task, an unexpected side effect arose. Visualizing a good pseudo-random number generator is noise and / or confusion. Obviously bad nobody wants to apply even for tests. I didn’t care, the very simple generator used completely satisfied me and, when handled carefully, produced an acceptable result. And suddenly, as if someone, with a confident stroke, began to give out elegant abstract drawings.
Only 22 points are connected by Bezier curves and such a funny result. Zagogulins can be infinitely generated and are not bored to watch them, like clouds. You can come up with an interesting game - unravel what happened this time to us by chance, what is the pattern in it and come up with a name for it.
But these curves have a more practical meaning. The generator is the product of the lower and upper parts of the processor tick counter, from which an unsigned remainder is taken. If you generate numbers rarely enough, randomness is tolerable. Here the numbers are generated often, randomness is bad, which is evident by the shapes of zagogulin. Despite the potential amount of 200 to the 22nd degree of different zagogulin, certain elements are most often repeated.
Presumably, the degree of “shaggyness” of the figure depends on the load on the system in those microseconds when the numbers were generated. The diagonal line, aka “traveler,” speaks of an almost linear dependence of random numbers on time and a small load on the system. "Scalaria" - about greater chance, which means a fairly high load ...
For those who want to have fun with purple squiggles, below is the code and some bright representatives.

---