No need to leave the idea, you have to go ahead!

And so, if you remember not so long ago, in a poetic form in one of the posts of the ISVir user it was described that "Habru" pees end.

In the comments (about 98%) there was absolute and unconditional support. In total, the topic gained about 70 votes, the votes were divided almost equally (but there were 10 more consonants). What did the author get for this topic? The author received a letter with the following content:

Come along, ISVir!

Unfortunately, I have to excommunicate you from Habr for 1000 days by blocking your account. However, on February 13, 2013 your account will be unblocked and you will be able to use it as before.

Regards, GUARD.

To which the author replied and started a whole correspondence, which will be submitted to your court. The purpose of the publication of this correspondence is to prove the administration’s disregard for the resource as thematic and professional, and attention is paid to it only as a loot that the author and I consider unacceptable and not honest with the local users.

Correspondence itself (blue - the administration of the Habr, black - the author of that topic):

Come along, ISVir!

Unfortunately, I have to excommunicate you from Habr for 1000 days by blocking your account. However, on February 13, 2013 your account will be unblocked and you will be able to use it as before.

Regards, GUARD.

Why are you guys excommunicating me for no reason? There was no mate, the people put pluses both in topic and in karma. You delete ... what then is WEB2.0? Or you take an example from the government of the Russian Federation - "We have democracy, but we do not allow it to be used." The community regulates itself, and there is nothing to intervene, this is not an emergency, not hacking, it’s quite a standard topic for itself, which, as I said, people like it, agree with it. Not good. Respect the answer, be so lenient.

Topics on Habr dedicated to discussing Habr were never supported by us, especially like yours: “Habr is going to die, Habr is not the same, Habr is soon pee ... end” well, leave the ranks of the participants, stand aside and see what all these praises are on project? Write a useful article, show an example to others, this is what Web2.0 is.
Topping up a topic is not an argument of its usefulness, especially when the ratio is + 25 / -21 = +4

Summary: We don’t see any point in publishing materials like yours on our project, since they don’t bring anything useful to the community.

Not supported by you? And what difference do they support you? Habr does not belong to you, so to speak ... you are just a servant of the people. I did not intend to leave the ranks of the participants either; I only urged the community to look at the problem, look directly and try (not just one, but all together) to rectify the situation. I wrote useful articles, very useful, I would even say exclusive material, because some of the problems that I described here were not covered on the Internet at all.

As for the plusing of the topic, what then is the argument in general? Those. the main shit climbs on the main one, which nobody really likes? You are talking nonsense, I probably know better than yours the self-regulation system on the hub The main thing is how your visitors think, and not how you think. You also messed up the attitude, at the time of removal for the topic there were about 70 votes, and the rating was +10, which means that I touched the people for the living, this was my goal.

Thus, it seems to me that I refute your resume and urge you to unblock your account with the restoration of the topic.

And yet, this topic does not deserve the author’s excommunication for 1000 days.

Our principles are unshakable from the moment the resource was founded and turned into one of the strongest Runet communities. Judging by your response letter, you do not plan to abide by and adhere to our rules and principles, considering us to be service personnel.

To begin with, you could describe your principles in order to speak about their unwaveringness, because only such remarks were noted in the text as: “were not supported”, “we do not see the point”. What principles are we talking about?

Then it is worth noting that there was no direct violation of the rules, because the absence was not even argued.

Yes, I consider you to be maintenance staff, which does not prevent you from being considered the administration, the creators and to thank you for this. However, again, this does not prevent me from believing that the administration and the creators, including the service personnel, may be mistaken; I encouraged you to rethink your attitude to this topic.

Unfortunately, you did everything not reasoned, and only in favor of yourself, what motivates you? Most likely, fear, fear of rebellion, revolution, but there can be no talk of any principles.

What do you think about what I said?

I repeat once again:

- Topics about Habr on Habr are never supported by the administration;
- Topics discussing the actions of the Administration;
There are a dozen points, partially indicated directly in the rules of the site. The sanctions imposed on you under the first paragraph.

>>> "Most likely fear, fear of rebellion, revolution, but there can be no talk of any principles."

And what kind of revolution and revolt are we talking about? The most interesting thing is who is she against the administration or between users new and old?

I would like to clarify that “not supported” and “forbidden” are two different things. I did not expect support from you, just like I did not expect excommunication for this topic.

Of course, too much has been said about the rebellion, but recently it is also impossible to deny a certain “condemnation” of the administration. I do not divide the user into "new" and "old", I divide a habr into "old" and "new". What is going on now? The main thing is filled with useless articles about jobs, about how to sleep, work, eat, how to write "Hello World" in PHP, a lot of copy-pastes, almost no original content! But not everything is so bad, there are still topics in the "new", but they are not displayed on the Habr, because they are interesting to units. Popularization of Habr led to a decrease in the quality of content, and I encouraged people to think about it.

And in the fact that I was excommunicated, I do not see a loss on my part, but I only see that you lost the author, who actually wrote technical topics, and not how to write HelloWorld, but more in-depth and professional ones. In any case, at the moment, responding to your letter, I am driven only by the desire to understand - “for what” and a little annoying.

As can be seen from this correspondence, the administration completely refuses to listen to the author of the topic. And he is discouraged by some "rotten" phrases.

But the problem that the author touched on existed and continues to exist, look at the main thing right now, what will you see there? You will see topics indirectly related to IT, practically ZERO of useful information, and every day the situation gets worse.

I propose to support the author of that topic! Those who agree with him, plus a topic!

And a huge request, if I am banned - save this text and publish it again! We ourselves are a community, we do not need a guide that leads us to the edge.

PS In each letter from the administration there was a signature:

The information in this email and any application is confidential and is intended only for the recipient. This letter may not be publicly distributed or used by anyone other than the addressee. If you are not a recipient, please inform us and delete all copies of the letter. Any copying, public placement or distribution is strictly prohibited.

But this is nonsense, the author has the right to publish how he wants and where he wants the information that came to him in the mail.