Tired of No. 2 (with evidence)
I came to work today, opened an rss reader and what I see ...
First, the Gmail post in a new way , where the author claims that he calculated all this himselfwithout going to the Internet in great numbers. Although here , quite by accident (and not the first time), this article.
Then even cooler - We generate the text for the “fish” in Microsoft Word, the article is all from the same site, and a completely different source is indicated, which in turn does not refer to the original, although the screenshots from this site are
therefore connected to the unfairly minus , gimlis with her tired and blia with a failed attempt to announceBlog Boyanov , creating extractor 'om
First, the Gmail post in a new way , where the author claims that he calculated all this himself
Then even cooler - We generate the text for the “fish” in Microsoft Word, the article is all from the same site, and a completely different source is indicated, which in turn does not refer to the original, although the screenshots from this site are
therefore connected to the unfairly minus , gimlis with her tired and blia with a failed attempt to announceBlog Boyanov , creating extractor 'om