Facebook "not sure" of the authenticity of a long-standing agreement signed by Zuckerberg
Today, Facebook officials said the company was “not sure” that the founder of the company, Mark Zuckerberg, signed an agreement with New Yorker Paul Czella in 2003. Let me remind you that the effect of the bomb was made by the message that the unknown Paul Chella claimed 84% of Facebook’s assets .
It is worth recalling that Chelya made a statement not just like that, he presented an agreement allegedly signed by Zuckerberg, where the current billionaire, and then university student Mark Zuckerberg, is committed to making The Facebook site for Chellia. The contract also provided for a penalty - 1% of the cost of the site for each day of downtime. Thus, in February 2004, Chelya seemed to own 84% of Facebook’s assets (according to Chelya).
Facebook is now worth $ 24.6 billion, according to estimates by SharesPost.com.
First, a Facebook spokeswoman said: “The lawsuit is very frivolous and we will fight decisively in court.” Now a new statement followed, stating that "At the moment, we are not sure that he signed this scrap of paper." So the lawyer of the company Lisa Simpson stated
At the same time, Simpson has already told the court that Zuckerberg really worked for Chely as a programmer. In addition, it was stated that Cegli submitted the contract too late, because in New York State the statute of limitations of the cases is 6 years. And Chelya dates the date of his lawsuit on February 4, 2004, when under the terms of this strange agreement 84% of the site’s assets should have been transferred to him.
True, now there are new interesting circumstances. Ceglia initially claimed that Zuckerberg had signed an agreement to create the Facebook site, but now he says that the first step was to create a StreetFax website with millions of street photos that would have paid access to its database. But along with this site, Zuckerberg was supposed to create the notorious “graduation album” for Harvard students.
Representatives of Facebook during the trial have repeatedly called the process "ridiculous." However, the trial is still ongoing, and apparently, the case is not the easiest.
Here is the source .